Primary School Teachers’ Educational Research: Educational Practice and Professional Development Context


  • Vincentas Lamanauskas Šiauliai University, Institute of Education, Lithuania
  • Dalia Augienė Šiauliai University, Institute of Education, Lithuania
  • Rita Makarskaitė-Petkevičienė Institute of Educational Sciences, Vilnius University, Lithuania



content analysis, educational research, qualitative research, primary school teachers


Teacher research activity is an important complex part of their work. Therefore, alongside with the other, their important professional competences, teacher research activity competence becomes a significant one. Teacher’s activity space has widened a lot. Carrying out various research, the teacher uses the obtained information firstly for their activity improvement. It is obvious that there is a lack of reliable research on this question. A deep gap exists between educational research and educational practice. This research aimed to ascertain primary school teachers’ position on educational research question. The research was carried out in 2019, in which 106 primary school teachers from various Lithuanian schools took part. A two-part research instrument was applied, which consisted of open-ended and closed-ended questions. A descriptive qualitative and quantitative content analysis was carried out. Though most of the teachers thought that educational research was important for their practical activity, however, the biggest gap between educational research and educational practice is most frequently determined by the lack of teacher competence in this sphere. There exists an obvious teacher support need as well as teacher professional development needs in the aspect of research availability/accessibility and its use in educational practice.


Download data is not yet available.


Bitinas, B. (1998). Ugdymo tyrimų metodologija [Educational research methodology]. Jošara.

Bitinas, B. (2002). Pedagoginės diagnostikos pagrindai [Basics of pedagogical diagnostics]. Vilniaus pedagoginio universiteto leidykla.

Bitinas, B., Rupšienė, L., & Žydžiūnaitė, V. (2008). Kokybinių tyrimų metodologija [Qualitative research methodology]. Socialinių mokslų kolegija.

Beycioglu, K., Ozer, N., & Ugurlu, C. T. (2010). Teachers` views on educational research. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26(4), 1088-1093.

Behrstock-Sherratt, E., Drill, K., & Miller, S. (2011). Is the supply in demand? Exploring how, when, and why teachers use research (Revised Edition). AIR: American Institute for Research.

Broekkamp, H., & van Hout-Wolters, B. (2007). The gap between educational research and practice: A literature review, symposium, and questionnaire. Educational Research and Evaluation, 13(3), 203-220.

Cekic, O., Ozturk, H., & Apaydin, S. (2018). Teachers’ views on educational research. Ahi Evran University Journal of Kirsehir Education Faculty, 19(1), 880-902.

Cousins, J. B., & Walker, C. (2000). Predictors of educators’ valuing of systematic inquiry in schools. Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation, Special Edition, 25–52.

Cochran-Smith, M., & Lytle, S. L. (1990). Research on teaching and teacher research: The issues that divide. Educational Researcher, 19(2), 2-11.

Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2016). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Sage publications.

Dezin, N. K. (1970). The research act: A theoretical introduction to sociological methods. Aldine Publishing.

Drill, K., Miller, S., & Behrstock-Sherratt, E. (2013). Teachers’ perspectives on educational research. Brock Education: A Journal of Educational Research and Practice, 23(1), 3-17

Ekız, D. (2006). Primary school teachers’ attitudes towards educational research. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 6(2), 395-402.

Everton, T., Galton, M., & Pell, T. (2002). Educational research and the teacher. Research Papers in Education Policy and Practice, 17(4), 373-401.

Gall, M. D., Borg, W. R., & Gall, J. P. (2003). Educational research: An introduction (7th Ed.). Pearson.

Geležinienė, R. (2006). Mokytojas kaip tyrėjas: koncepto operacionalizacija ir veiklos perspektyva ugdant emocijų ir elgesio problemų turinčius vaikus [Teacher as a researcher: Operationalisation of the concept and prospects in educating students with emotional and behaviour difficulties]. Specialusis ugdymas / Special Education, 2(15), 27–36.

Guščinskienė, J. (2002). Taikomoji sociologija: struktūrinės loginės schemos ir komentarai [Applied sociology: Structural logical schemes and comments]. Technologija.

Gu, L., & Wang, J. (2006). School-based research and professional learning: An innovative model to promote teacher professional development in China. Teaching Education, 17(1), 59-73.

Hathorn, C., & Dillon, A. M. (2018). Action research as professional development: Its role in education reform in the United Arab Emirates. Issues in Educational Research, 28(1), 99-119.

Janiūnaitė, B. (2004). Edukacinės novacijos ir jų diegimas [Educational innovations and their implementation]. Technologija.

Lamanauskas, & Augienė, D. (2016). Scientific research activity of students pre-service teachers of sciences at university: Significance, readiness, effectiveness and career aspects. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 15(6), 746-758.

Langdridge, D., & Hagger-Johnson, G. (2009). Introduction to research methods and data analysis in psychology. Pearson Education.

Lofthouse, R. M. (2014). Engaging in educational research and development through teacher practitioner enquiry; a pragmatic or naïve approach? Education Today, 64(4), 13-19.

Lysenko, L. V., Abrami, P. C., Bernard, R. M., Dagenais, C., & Janosz, M. (2014). Educational research in educational practice: Predictors of use. Canadian Journal of Education, 37(2), 1-26.

Mayring, P. (2002). Qualitative content analysis: Research instrument or mode of interpretation? In M. Kiegelmann (Ed.), The role of the researcher in qualitative psychology (pp. 139-148). Ingeborg Huber.

Marcos, J. J. M., & Tillema, H. (2006). Studying studies on teacher reflection and action: An appraisal of research contributions. Educational Research Review, 1(2), 112-132.

Merriam, S. B. (1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education. Revised and expanded from” Case study research in education” (2nd ed.). Jossey-Bass Publishers.

Mockus, K. (2011). Mokslinis ugdymo (-si) veiksnių pažinimas mokykloje – pilietiškumo ugdymo požymis [The scientific knowledge of educational factors at school – the educational feature of public spirit]. Tiltai, 3(56), 215-226.

Morse, J. M. (1994). Designing funded qualitative research. In Denizin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd Ed). Sage.

Morse, J. M. (1991). Approaches to qualitative-quantitative methodological triangulation. Nursing research, 40(2), 120-123.

Neuman, W. L. (1997). Social research methods: Qualitative and quantitative approaches (3rd Ed.). Allyn and Bacon.

Nezvalova, D. (2011). Can be the preservice science teacher a researcher? Problems of Education in the 21st Century, 37, 90-97.

Pečiuliauskienė, P. (2008). Būsimųjų mokytojų tiriamosios veiklos ir vadovavimo tiriamajai veiklai kompetencija: palyginamasis aspektas [Pre-service teachers’ competence in research and conducting research activity: The comparative aspect] Pedagogika / Pedagogy, 91, 35- 41.

Rodrigues, S. (2008). An appraisal of the criticisms of educational research in recent years. Education-Line, 1-4.

Shreeve, A. (2004). Doing and using educational research: Engaging researchers, practitioners and policy makers in productive partnerships. Educar, 34, 85-95.

Stankevič, E. (2014). Būsimų anglų kalbos mokytojų edukacinių tyrimų samprata: Lietuvos edukologijos universiteto atvejis [The concept of educational research for future English language teachers: The case of the Lithuanian University of Educational Sciences]. Kalba ir kontekstai / Language in Different Contexts, 6(1), 260-271.

Stevens, J. P. (2012). Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences. Routledge.

Stremmel, A. (2007). The value of teacher research: Nurturing professional and personal growth through inquiry. Voices of Practitioners, 2(3), 1-9.

Stringer, E. T. (2007). Action research (3rd Ed.). Sage.

Vanderlinde, R., & van Braak, J. (2010). The gap between educational research and practice: Views of teachers, school leaders, intermediaries and researchers. British Educational Research Journal, 36(2), 299-316.

Vilkonis, R., & Vilkonienė, M. (2009). Lietuvos bendrojo lavinimo mokykloje pedagogų atliekami edukaciniai tyrimai: situacijos analizė [Teachers’ educational researches carried out at the Lithuanian comprehensive school: The situation analysis]. Mokytojų ugdymas / Teacher Education, 12(1), 44-57.

Weinberger, Y. (2018). Using qualitative research methods to cope with the educational complexity. Journal of Education and Human Development, 7(1), 135-145.




How to Cite

Lamanauskas, V., Augienė, D., & Makarskaitė-Petkevičienė, R. (2020). Primary School Teachers’ Educational Research: Educational Practice and Professional Development Context. International Journal of Cognitive Research in Science, Engineering and Education (IJCRSEE), 8(3), 1–18.



Received 2020-09-09
Accepted 2020-10-12
Published 2020-12-20

Similar Articles

<< < 1 2 3 4 5 6 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.