Education in the Age of AI: Adaptive Systems, Assessment, and Responsible Governance

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.23947/2334-8496-2026-14-1-135-144

Keywords:

artificial intelligence, education, adaptive learning, EU AI Act, transparency, policy and governance

Abstract

 This paper examines how Artificial Intelligence in Education (AIED) is reshaping teaching and learning, drawing on a systematic literature review alongside policy analysis to explore practical applications, the theories behind them, and their governance consequences. Adopting the EU AI Act’s risk-based lens, we investigate the ways in which regulatory demands—ranging from transparency and data stewardship to human oversight and provider accountability—influence how AIED tools are built and taken up in practice. We group current uses into four areas—adaptive learning, intelligent assessment, learner profiling, and emerging tools—and read them through the prism of well-known learning theories such as constructivism. The analysis underscores that while these technologies hold real promise, several prominent use cases—automated grading and learner profiling, for instance— fall squarely within the EU AI Act’s higher-obligation categories, which means equity, explainability, and genuine human control are not optional but essential for public trust. On the basis of these findings, we put forward concrete, compliance-oriented recommendations aimed at helping educators, institutions, and policymakers deploy AI responsibly across varied educational settings.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

ENISA. (2024, October). Threat landscape. European Union Agency for Cybersecurity. https://www.enisa.europa.eu/topics/ cyber-threats/threat-landscape

European Commission. (2025, August 1). AI Act | Shaping Europe’s digital future. https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/policies/regulatory-framework-ai

European Commission, Directorate-General for Education, Youth, Sport and Culture. (2022). Ethical guidelines on the use of artificial intelligence (AI) and data in teaching and learning for educators. Publications Office of the European Union.

https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2766/153756

European Parliament. (2025, February 19). EU AI Act: First regulation on artificial intelligence. https://www.europarl.europa.eu/ topics/en/article/20230601STO93804/eu-ai-act-first-regulation-on-artificial-intelligence

European Union. (2024, June 13). Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 of the European Parliament and of the Council laying down harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Artificial Intelligence Act) and amending Regulations (EC) No 300/2008, (EU) No 167/2013, (EU) No 168/2013, (EU) 2018/858, (EU) 2018/1139 and (EU) 2019/2144 and Directives 2014/90/ EU, (EU) 2016/797 and (EU) 2020/1828. Official Journal of the European Union, L (12 July 2024), 1–144. http://data. europa.eu/eli/reg/2024/1689/oj

Friedman, L., Black, N. B., Walker, E., & Roschelle, J. (2021, November 8). Safe AI in education needs you. Communications of the ACM Blog. https://cacm.acm.org/blogs/blog-cacm/256657-safe-ai-in-education-needs-you/fulltext

Gartner. (2025). Augmented intelligence. Gartner Glossary. https://www.gartner.com/en/information-technology/glossary/ augmented-intelligence

Ivković, R. (2025). Transformation and economic aspects of software engineering through the implementation of the EU AI Act. Pravo – Teorija i Praksa, 42(1), 186–200. https://doi.org/10.5937/ptp2501186I

Maslej, N., et al. (2023). AI Index 2023 annual report. Stanford University, Institute for Human-Centered AI (HAI). https://aiindex.stanford.edu/report/

Miao, F., & Holmes, W. (2023). Guidance for generative AI in education and research. UNESCO. https://www.unesco.org/en/ articles/guidance-generative-ai-education-and-research

OECD. (2022). OECD framework for the classification of AI systems. OECD Publishing. https://www.oecd.org/content/dam/ oecd/en/publications/reports/2022/02/oecd-framework-for-the-classification-of-ai-systems_336a8b57/cb6d9eca-en.pdf

The White House, Office of Science and Technology Policy. (2022, October). Blueprint for an AI Bill of Rights: Making automated systems work for the American people. https://www.whitehouse.gov/ostp/ai-bill-of-rights/

U.S. Department of Education, Office of Educational Technology. (2022). Advancing digital equity for all: Community-based recommendations. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED624655.pdf

U.S. Department of Education, Office of Educational Technology. (2023). Artificial intelligence and the future of teaching and learning: Insights and recommendations. https://tech.ed.gov

Wang, S., Wang, F., Zhu, Z., Wang, J., Tran, T., & Du, Z. (2024). Artificial intelligence in education: A systematic literature review. Expert Systems with Applications, 252, 124167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2024.124167

IEEE-USA Board of Directors. (2017, February 10). Artificial intelligence research, development and regulation [Position statement]. IEEE-USA Global Public Policy. http://globalpolicy.ieee.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/IEEE17003.pdf

Downloads

Published

2026-05-13

How to Cite

Dimić, G., Spalević, Žaklina, Nešić, M., Ivković, R., Sotiroski, D., Vasić, Čedomir, & Vučković, D. (2026). Education in the Age of AI: Adaptive Systems, Assessment, and Responsible Governance. International Journal of Cognitive Research in Science, Engineering and Education (IJCRSEE), 14(1), 135–144. https://doi.org/10.23947/2334-8496-2026-14-1-135-144

Metrics

Plaudit

Received 2026-01-02
Accepted 2026-04-23
Published 2026-05-13

Most read articles by the same author(s)