Digital Communication Platforms for Institutional Branding: A Conceptual Review of Learning, Digital Literacy, and AI/Ml Integration
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.23947/2334-8496-2026-14-1-125-133Keywords:
digital communication platform, institutional branding, learning, digital literacy, artificial intelligence, machine learningAbstract
This paper examines the role of digital communication platforms in institutional branding in higher education, with particular attention to learning processes, digital literacy, and the integration of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML). Based on a structured review and theoretical synthesis of interdisciplinary literature, the study conceptualizes institutional branding as a dynamic and relational process shaped by digitally mediated interactions among multiple stakeholders.The analysis integrates three interrelated dimensions: digital communication platforms and institutional strategies, stakeholders’ digital literacy as a mediating factor in engagement and trust formation, and the role of AI/ML systems in personalizing content, shaping visibility, and quantifying engagement, including their ethical implications. The paper argues that digital platforms function as infrastructural spaces for the co-creation of institutional reputation, while digital literacy enables meaningful engagement and trust. At the same time, AI/ML systems enhance communicative efficiency but introduce reputational and ethical risks. The study proposes a conceptual framework to support future empirical research and the development of responsible communication strategies in higher education.
Downloads
References
Balmer, J. M. T., & Liao, M.-N. (2007). Student corporate brand identification: An exploratory case study. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 12(4), 356–375. https://doi.org/10.1108/13563280710832515
Bucher, T. (2018).If…then: Algorithmic power and politics. Oxford University Press.https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190493028.001.0001
Chapleo, C. (2010). What defines “successful” university brands? International Journal of Public Sector Management, 23(2), 169–183. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513551011022519
Constantinides, E., & Zinck Stagno, M. C. (2011). Potential of the social media as instruments of higher education marketing. Journal of Marketing for Higher Education, 21(1), 7–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/08841241.2011.573593
Craig, C. D. (2022). A systematic review of higher education online branding. Ontario Tech University Press. https://ontariotechu.scholaris.ca/bitstreams/96ecbe69-b8ed-4e06-b2e6-a632fc469e8e/download
Davenport, T. H., Guha, A., Grewal, D., & Bressgott, T. (2020). How artificial intelligence will change the future of marketing. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 48(1), 24–42. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-019-00696-0
De Mauro, A., Greco, M., & Grimaldi, M. (2022). Machine learning and artificial intelligence use in marketing: A systematic review. Italian Journal of Marketing, 2022(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s43039-022-00057-w
Floridi, L., Cowls, J., Beltrametti, M., et al. (2018). AI4People—An ethical framework for a good AI society. Minds and Machines, 28(4), 689–707. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11023-018-9482-5
Franjić, S. (2022). Internet and modern information technology in the function of society development. Management horizons, 2(1). https://hm.edu.rs/index.php/hm/article/view/32
Gaudiaut, T. (2025). Scams, Fake-News, Jobs: The Biggest AI Concerns. Statista. https://www.statista.com/chart/35535/biggest-ai-concerns-in-the-us/
Gaudiaut, T. (2026). Data Leaks Through AI Become a Major Cybersecurity Concern. Statista. https://www.statista.com/chart/ amp/35663/main-cybersecurity-concerns-related-to-ai/
Grewal, D., Hulland, J., Kopalle, P. K., & Karahanna, E. (2020). The future of technology and marketing: A multidisciplinary perspective. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 48(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-019-00711-4
Hardcastle, K., Vorster, L., & Brown, D. M. (2025). Understanding customer responses to AI-driven personalized journeys: Impacts on the customer experience. Journal of Advertising, 54(2), 176–195. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.2025.2460985
Hamadi, R. (2025). The importance of using generative artificial intelligence applications enhancing the teaching efficiency of phisical education and sports teachers at the elementary level. Sport media and business, 11(3) 41-54. https://doi. org/10.58984/smb2503041h
Hemsley-Brown, J., & Goonawardana, S. (2007). Brand harmonization in the international higher education market. Journal of Business Research, 60(9), 942–948. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2007.01.019
Hemsley-Brown, J., Melewar, T. C., Nguyen, B., & Wilson, E. J. (2016). Exploring brand identity, meaning, image, and reputation (BIMIR) in higher education. Journal of Business Research, 69(8), 3019–3032. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. jbusres.2016.01.016
Huang, J., & Zhou, A. (2025). Generative AI outperforms humans in social media engagement: Evidence from GPT-4 and the FIIT model. Public Relations Review, 51(5), 102643. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2025.102643
Huang, M.-H., & Rust, R. T. (2018). Artificial intelligence in service. Journal of Service Research, 21(2), 155–172. https://doi. org/10.1177/1094670517752459
Huang, M.-H., & Rust, R. T. (2021). A strategic framework for artificial intelligence in marketing. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 49(1), 30–50. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-020-00749-9
Ilomäki, L., Paavola, S., Lakkala, M., & Kantosalo, A. (2016). Digital competence – an emergent boundary concept for policy and educational research. Education and Information Technologies, 21(3), 655–679. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-014-9346-4
Ivy, J. (2008). A new higher education marketing mix: The 7Ps for MBA marketing. International Journal of Educational Management, 22(4), 288–299. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513540810875635
Kaplan, A. M., & Haenlein, M. (2019). Siri, Siri, in my hand: Who’s the fairest in the land? On the interpretations, illustrations, and implications of artificial intelligence. Business Horizons, 62(1), 15–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2018.08.004
Kimmons, R., & Veletsianos, G. (2018). Public Internet data mining methods in instructional design, educational technology, and online learning research. TechTrends, 62(5), 492–500. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-018-0307-4
Lea, M. R., & Jones, S. (2011). Digital literacies in higher education: Exploring textual and technological practice. Studies in Higher Education, 36(4), 377–393. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075071003664021
López-Núñez, J.-A., Alonso-García, S., Berral-Ortiz, B., & Victoria-Maldonado, J.-J. (2024). A systematic review of digital competence evaluation in higher education. Education Sciences, 14(11), 1181. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14111181
Lunić, T., & Ćesarević, J. (2025). Artificial intelligence and the future of planet. Management horizons, 5(1), 93–111. https:// hm.edu.rs/index.php/hm/article/view/8
Martin, K. (2019). Ethical implications and accountability of algorithms. Journal of Business Ethics, 160(4), 835–850. https:// doi.org/10.1007/s10551-018-3921-3
Mittelstadt, B. D., Allo, P., Taddeo, M., Wachter, S., & Floridi, L. (2016). The ethics of algorithms: Mapping the debate. Big Data & Society, 3(2), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951716679679
Ng, I. C. L., & Forbes, J. (2009). Education as service: The understanding of university experience through the service logic. Journal of Marketing for Higher Education, 19(1), 38–64. https://doi.org/10.1080/08841240902904703
Palomino, J. C. V., Meza, C. R., & O’Brien, J. (2026). Uncovering emerging research themes in higher education branding: A bibliometric analysis. Journal of Scientometric Research, 14(3), 782–792. https://doi.org/10.5530/jscires.20251296
Pawar, S. K. (2024). Social media in higher education marketing: A systematic literature review and research agenda. Cogent Business & Management, 11(1), 2423059. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2024.2423059
Pinar, M., Trapp, P., Girard, T., & Boyt, T. E. (2014). University brand equity: An empirical investigation of its dimensions. International Journal of Educational Management, 28(6), 616–634. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEM-04-2013-0051
Shneiderman, B. (2020). Human-centered artificial intelligence: Reliable, safe & trustworthy. International Journal of Human– Computer Interaction, 36(6), 495–504. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2002.04087
Spante, M., Hashemi, S., Lundin, M., & Algers, A. (2018). Digital competence and digital literacy in higher education research: Systematic review of concept use. Cogent Education, 5(1), 1519143. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2018.1519143
Stanković, B., Pavlović, Lj., & Stanković, M. (2024). Education for research and the moral responsibility of researchers. Srpska Akademska Misao, 9(1), 19–33. https://www.sam.edu.rs/index.php/sam/article/view/64
Teepapal, T. (2025). AI-driven personalization: Unraveling consumer perceptions in social media engagement. Computers in Human Behavior, 165, 108549. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2024.108549
Vuković, M., Riznić, D., & Vuković, A. (2023). The quality of higher education and strategic management. Srpska Akademska Misao, 8(1), 7–21. https://www.sam.edu.rs/index.php/sam/article/view/52
van Deursen, A. J. A. M., & van Dijk, J. A. G. M. (2014). The digital divide shifts to differences in usage. New Media & Society, 16(3), 507–526. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444813487959
Wedel, M., & Kannan, P. K. (2016). Marketing analytics for data-rich environments. Journal of Marketing, 80(6), 97–121. https:// doi.org/10.1509/jm.15.0413
Zawacki-Richter, O., Marín, V. I., Bond, M., & Gouverneur, F. (2019). Systematic review of research on artificial intelligence applications in higher education: Where are the educators? International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16(1), 39. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0171-0
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Categories
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Biljana Vitković, Dejan Dašić, Gruja Kostadinović, Marija Ilievski Kostadinović

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Plaudit
Accepted 2026-03-23
Published 2026-05-13


