International Journal of Cognitive Research in Science, Engineering and Education (IJCRSEE)

IJCRSEE Editorial Team; Jelena Matijašević; Maja Petrović; Anja Koprivica

doi:10.23947/2334-8496-2025-13-3-811-822

Authors

Jelena Matijašević University Business Academy in Novi Sad, Faculty of Law for Commerce and Judiciary in Novi Sad, The Republic of Serbia https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8068-0816
Maja Petrović University Business Academy in Novi Sad, Faculty of Law for Commerce and Judiciary in Novi Sad, The Republic of Serbia https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2342-196X
Anja Koprivica University Business Academy in Novi Sad, Faculty of Law for Commerce and Judiciary in Novi Sad, The Republic of Serbia https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6188-5605

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.23947/2334-8496-2025-13-3-811-822

Keywords:

criminal proceedings, defendant, interrogation, evidentiary action, psychological functions, psychological aspects of testimony formation

Abstract

The defendant is the main procedural subject and a party in criminal proceedings. Only a natural person who is procedurally competent to exercise their rights and duties can acquire the status of a defendant in criminal proceedings. The procedural competence of the defendant includes two fundamental characteristics – a certain age and mental health. The defendant’s testimony can only be obtained through interrogation. Interrogation of the defendant is an evidentiary action that consists of the defendant’s statement regarding the criminal offense he is charged with and falls into the category of personal evidence. The legal side of the defendant’s interrogation, which regulates his position and his set of rights and duties, as well as legally defined institutions ensuring equality with the opposing party (i.e., the prosecutor), represents a necessary form and condition for a court decision to be based on such evidence, in accordance with the Criminal Procedure Code. However, aside from its legal dimension, the interrogation also entails psychological aspects. Accordingly, this paper analyzes the position of the defendant in criminal proceedings, as well as the psychological aspects of his participation and testimony before the competent authorities. Considering the rights and obligations of the defendant, the available legal means that ensure procedural equality with the prosecutor, but also the various pressures and mental states the defendant experiences (fear, uncertainty, discomfort, shame, humiliation, etc.), along with his motivation to actively participate in the proceedings, and his ability to remain silent or speak untruthfully, it is evident that the defendant can neither be unmotivated nor uninterested in the outcome of the proceedings. Therefore, it was essential to consider the role and significance of the defendant’s psychological functions and personality traits, which considerably influence both his ability to testify and the validity, truthfulness, and credibility of his statement. The paper is methodologically based on a theoretical, primarily desk-based analysis of relevant contemporary views in domestic and foreign theory, normative analysis of current legislative sources, inductive and deductive approaches in research, and descriptive analysis of indicators relevant to the psychology of the defendant and the psychological foundations of his testimony in criminal proceedings.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aćimović, M. (1987). Psihologija zločina i suđenja, sudska psihologija [Psychology of crimes and trials, forensic psychology], Beograd, Savremena administracija.

Aćimović, M. (1980). Uvod u psihologiju krivičnog postupka [Introduction to the psychology of criminal procedure]. Beograd, Savremena administracija.

Baić, V. & Deljkić, I. (2019). Kriminalistička psihologija [Criminal psychology], Sarajevo, Fakultet za kriminalistiku, kriminologiju i sigurnosne studije.

Bejatović, S., Škulić, M., Đurđić, V., Ilić, G., Čvorović, D., Milojević, D., Đorđević, D., Kiurski, J., Matić, M., Tintor, J., Subotić, D., Komlen Nikolić, L., Lazić, R., Nenadić, S., Trninić, V., & Plazinić, M. (2013). Priručnik za javne tužioce za primenu novog Zakonika o krivičnom postupku [Handbook for public prosecutors for the implementation of the new Criminal Procedure Code] (ur.: Bejatović, S., Škulić, M. i Ilić, G.). Beograd, Udruženje javnih tužilaca i zamenika javnih tužilaca Srbije. https://uts.org.rs/wp-content/uploads/2007/11/prirucnik.zkp_.novi_.pdf

Brkić, S. (2014). Krivično procesno pravo I [Criminal procedural law I], Novi Sad, Pravni fakultet u Novom Sadu.

Ćirić Z. & Dimitrijević B. (2009). Osnovi sudske psihijatrije i psihologije [Basics of forensic psychiatry and psychology]. Niš, Studenski kulturni centar.

Damaška, M. (1962). Okrivljenikov iskaz kao dokaz u suvremenom krivičnom procesu [The defendant’s testimony as evidence in the modern criminal process], Zagreb, Narodne novine.

Delić, N. (2011). Pojam i struktura iskaza - sudskopsihološki aspekt [Term and structure of testimony - forensic psychological aspect]. Godišnjak Pravnog fakulteta, 2 (2), 1-19. https://godisnjak.pravni.ues.rs.ba/pdf%202011%20br2/Pojam%20i%20struktura%20iskaza%20sudskopsiholo%C5%A1ki%20aspekt.pdf

Delić, N. (2008). Psihologija iskaza pojednih učesnika u krivičnom postupku [Psychology of testimony of individual participants in criminal proceedings], Beograd, Dosije.

Drakić, D. (2014). Krivično pravo i psihologija – tačke spajanja [Criminal law and psychology - points of convergence], Zbornik radova Pravnog fakulteta u Novom Sadu, 48 (2), 243-256. https://doi.org/10.5937/zrpfns48-6736 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5937/zrpfns48-6736

Flower, L. (2020). Interactional Justice: The Role of Emotions in the Performance of Loyalty. New York, Routledge.

Golubović, G. Z., Lakić, A. & Ilić, B. (2002). Osnovi forenzičke psihologije i psihopatologije [Basics of forensic psychology and psychopathology]. Bor, Zdravstveni centar Bor.

Grubač, M. (2004). Krivično procesno pravo: Uvod i opšti deo [Criminal procedural law: Introduction and general part], Beograd, Službeni glasnik.

Gudjonsson, G. H. (2003). The Psychology of Interrogations and Confessions: A Handbook, West Sussex, England, John Wiley & Sons. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470713297

Hughes, E. & Khan, K. (2024). One Court, One State, One Year: What We Don’t Know About Criminal Defendants’ Testimony and Why It Matters, Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review, 57 (2), pp. 333-384. https://digitalcommons.lmu.edu/llr/vol57/iss2/2/

Jekić, Z. (2003). Krivično procesno pravo: osmo izmenjeno i dopunjeno izdanje [Criminal procedural law, Eighth Revised Edition]. Beograd, Dimitrije Davidović.

Jekić, Z. (2001). Krivično procesno pravo [Criminal procedural law], Beograd, Savremena administracija.

Kim, K., Becker-Cohen, M., and Serakos, M. (2015). The Processing and Treatment of Mentally Ill Persons in the Criminal Justice System: A Scan of Practice and Background Analysis, Washington, DC, Urban Institute. https://www.urban.org/research/publication/processing-and-treatment-mentally-ill-persons-criminal-justice-system

Kostić, I. (2000). Kriminalistička psihologija [Criminal psychology]. Beograd, Viša škola unutrašnjih poslova.

Lach, A., Klubińska, M. & Badowiec, R. (2022). Conflicting interests of witnesses and defendants in a fair criminal trial – can a hearing by videoconference be the best instrument to reconcile them?, Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal, 8 (3), 1157-1199. https://doi.org/10.22197/rbdpp.v8i3.737 DOI: https://doi.org/10.22197/rbdpp.v8i3.737

Marić, J. & Lukić, M. (1998). Pravna medicina [Legal medicine]. Beograd, Barex.

Matijević, M. & Marković, M. (2013). Kriminalistika [Criminalistics]. Novi Sad, Pravni fakultet za privredu I pravosuđe u Novom Sadu.

Matijašević, J. (2024). Krivično procesno pravo, opšto deo: drugo izmenjeno i dopunjeno izdanje [Criminal procedural law, General Part: Second Revised Edition], Novi Sad, Pravni fakultet za privredu i pravosuđe u Novom Sadu.

Matijašević Obradović, J. & Subotin, M. (2020). Načelo kontradiktornosti kao opšti element prava na pravičan postupak u praksi Krivičnog suda Srbije i Evropskog suda za ljudska prava [The principle of contradiction as a general element of the right to a fair procedure in the practice of the Criminal Court of Serbia and the European Court of Human Rights], Pravo – teorija i praksa, 37 (1), 34-46. https://doi.org/10.5937/ptp2001034M DOI: https://doi.org/10.5937/ptp2001034M

Matijašević Obradović, J. & Zarubica, S. (2018). Opasnost od bekstva kao razlog za određivanje pritvora– legislativni tretman i primeri iz sudske prakse [The threat of escape as a reason for the determination of detention – a legislative treatment and examples from judicial practice]. Pravo – teorija i praksa, 35 (4-6), 1-16. https://scindeks-clanci.ceon.rs/data/pdf/0352-3713/2018/0352-37131806001M.pdf DOI: https://doi.org/10.5937/ptp1806001M

Meissner, A. C., & Russano, B. M. (2003). The Psychology of Interrogations and False Confessions:Research and Recommendations, The Canadian Journal of Police & Security Services, 1 (1), 53-64. https://scholarworks.utep.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1010&context=christian_meissner

Milovanović, R. (2005). Psihologija kriminaliteta [Psychology of crime]. Beograd, Policijska akademija.

Milošević, M., Stevanović, Č. (1997). Krivično procesno pravo [Criminal procedural law], Beograd, Policijska akademija.

Mirkov, Ž. (2019). O pojmu okrivljenog i njegovom iskazu u krivičnom postupku [On the notion of the defendant and his testimony in criminal proceedings]. Civitas, 9(2), 161-176. https://civitas.rs/09/9-2/Zeljko-Mirkov-9-2-srb.pdf DOI: https://doi.org/10.5937/Civitas1902161M

Mirkov, Ž. (2016). Pravni i psihološki aspekti iskaza okrivljenog [Legal and psychological aspects of the defendant’s statement]. Doktorska disertacija, Novi Sad, Pravni fakultet za privredu I pravosuđe u Novom Sadu.

Nilsson, E. (2021). Performance of the Defendant Role: An Ethnographic Study of Interaction at Criminal Trials in Sweden. Master’s thesis, Sweden, Lund University.

Nikolić Ristanović & Konstantinović Vilić (2018). Kriminologija [Criminology], četvrto izmenjeno i dopunjeno izdanje, Beograd, Izdavačko-grafičko preduzeće „Prometej“. https://www.vds.rs/File/KnjigaKriminologija_2018.pdf

Perović, M. (2020). Određeni problemi utvrđivanja neuračunljivosti [Specific problems of establishing mental capacity]. Pravni horizonti, 3 (3), 111-127. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10804747

Rot, N. (2010). Psihologija ličnosti [Personality psychology]. Beograd, Zavod za udžbenike.

Rot, N. (1977). Psihologija ličnosti, deveto izdanje [Personality Psychology, Ninth Edition], Beograd, Zavod za udžbenike i nastavna sredstva.

Spaulding, W., Cook, E., and Avila, A. (2014). Therapeutic jurisprudence and recovery from severe and disabling mental illness. In Bornstein, B. H. & Wiener, R. L. (Eds.): Justice, conflict and wellbeing: Multidisciplinary perspectives, pp. 125–148, Germany, Springer Science + Business Media. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-0623-9_5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-0623-9_5

Stevanović, Č., Stanojević, P. (2005). Krivično procesno pravo [Criminal procedural law], Niš, Sven.

Škulić, M., Bugarski, T. (2015). Krivično procesno pravo [Criminal procedural law]. Novi Sad, Centar za izdavačku delatnost, Pravni fakultet, Univerzitet u Novom Sadu

Škulić, M. (2013). Krivično procesno pravo [Criminal procedural law]. Beograd, Pravni fakultet Univerziteta u Beogradu.

Tešović, O. (2024). Problem-solving courts in comparative law: Com-bination of therapy and responsibility, NBP. Nauka, bezbednost, policija, 29 (2), 134–150. https://doi.org/10.5937/nabepo29-48482 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5937/nabepo29-48482

Ustav Republike Srbije [Constitution of the Republic of Serbia], “Sl. glasnik RS”, br. 98/2006 i 115/2021.

Wexler, D. B., (2013). Getting and Giving: What therapeutic jurisprudence can get from and give to positive Criminology. Phoenix Law Review, 6, 907-915. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2220509 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2220509

Wiener, R. L. & Brank, E. M. (2013). Problem solving courts : social science and legal perspectives, New York, NY, Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7403-6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7403-6

Wilson, T. (2019). Courtroom Psychology during Criminal Trials and its Therapeutic Role on Victims and Offenders, doctoral dissertation, Minneapolis, USA, Walden University.

Zakon o maloletnim učiniocima krivičnih dela i krivičnopravnoj zaštiti maloletnih lica [Law on juvenile offenders and criminal protection of minors], “Sl. glasnik RS”, br. 85/2005.

Zakonik o krivičnom postupku [Criminal Procedure Code], “Sl. glasnik RS”, br. 72/2011, 101/2011, 121/2012, 32/2013, 45/2013, 55/2014, 35/2019, 27/2021 - odluka US i 62/2021 - odluka US.