Predictors of Attitudes Towards Domestic Violence: The Role of Gender Beliefs and Authenticity
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.23947/2334-8496-2025-13-3-765-778Keywords:
gender-based violence, justification of violence, gender roles, authenticity, romantic relationshipsAbstract
Gender-based violence represents one of the most serious forms of violation of women’s human rights, deeply rooted in gender stereotypes and patriarchal patterns. The aim of this study was to examine the relationships between gender beliefs, authenticity in romantic relationships, and attitudes towards domestic violence against women. The research was conducted on a sample of 201 participants through an online platform. The variables were operationalized using the Domestic Violence Myth Acceptance Scale, the Gender Equality Attitudes Scale and the Serbian adaptation of the Authenticity in Relationships Scale – AIRS-22. The results indicate strong and consistent gender differences: on average, men express greater tolerance towards violence compared to women, while women show stronger support for egalitarian gender roles across all domains. The most stable predictor of attitudes towards the justification of partner violence was egalitarianism in the educational role, pointing to the importance of the educational system as a key space for socialization and value transmission. Furthermore, participants from rural areas displayed greater tolerance towards violence and more traditional attitudes about gender roles compared to participants from urban areas. Contrary to expectations, authenticity in romantic relationships did not make a significant contribution in predicting attitudes towards violence, suggesting that global attitudes are predominantly shaped by cultural and social norms rather than individual characteristics. These findings have important implications for the development of preventive and educational programs that emphasize the strengthening of egalitarian values in educational contexts and society as a whole, with particular attention to differences between urban and rural settings.
Downloads
References
Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T
Almeida, I., Ramalho, A., Morgado, R., & Baúto, R. V. (2023). Gendered Perspectives on Intimate Partner Violence: A Comparative Study of General Population, Students and Professionals’ Beliefs. Social Sciences, 12(9), 528. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci12090528 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci12090528
Amato, P. R. (2010). Research on divorce: Continuing trends and new developments. Journal of Marriage and Family, 72(3), 650–666. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2010.00723.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2010.00723.x
Antović, A. R. (2016). Predikcija i prevencija femicida u nasilnim partnerskim odnosima (Doktorska disertacija). Univerzitet u Beogradu – Fakultet za specijalnu edukaciju i rehabilitaciju. COBISS ID: 1025563629.
Autonomous Women’s Center. (2023). Independent reports on Law on prevention of domestic violence – 2023 data. https://www.womenngo.org.rs/en/independent-reports-on-law-on-prevention-of-dv
Babović, M. (2010). Rodne ekonomske nejednakosti u komparativnoj perspektivi: Evropska unija i Srbija. Beograd: Institut za sociološka istraživanja Filozofskog fakulteta Univerziteta u Beogradu.
Berger, P. L., & Luckmann, T. (1966). The social construction of reality: A treatise in the sociology of knowledge. Anchor Books.
Blagojević Hjuson, M. (2013). Rodni barometar u Srbiji: Razvoj i svakodnevni život. Beograd: UNDP i OEBS.
Blagojević, M. (2013). Rodni barometar u Srbiji: Razvoj i svakodnevni život [Gender barometer in Serbia: Development and everyday life]. UN Women. [in Serbian]
Brown, B. (2010). The gifts of imperfection: Let go of who you think you’re supposed to be and embrace who you are. Center City, MN: Hazelden Publishing.
Browne, Evie (2017). Gender Norms in the Western Balkans. The Institute of Development Studies and Partner Organisations. Report. https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12413/13114
CEDAW Committee. (1992). General Recommendation No. 19: Violence against women. United Nations Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination Against Women. https://www.refworld.org/legal/resolution/cedaw/1992/en/96542
Council of Europe. (2011). Council of Europe Convention on preventing and combating violence against women and domestic violence (Istanbul Convention). https://www.coe.int/en/web/istanbul-convention/about-the-convention
Cropanzano, R., Anthony, E. L., Daniels, S. R., & Hall, A. V. (2016). Social exchange theory: A critical review with theoretical remedies. Academy of Management Annals, 11(1), 1–38. https://doi.org/10.5465/annals.2015.0099 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/annals.2015.0099
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227–268. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01
Despotović, M. (2017). Tipologija nasilnika u partnerskim odnosima. Beograd: Institut za kriminološka i sociološka istraživanja.
Dinić, B. M. (2019). Psihometrija i statistika u psihološkim istraživanjima. Novi Sad: Filozofski fakultet.
Djikanovic, B., Jansen, H. A., & Otasevic, S. (2010). Factors associated with intimate partner violence against women in Serbia: a cross-sectional study. Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health, 64(8), 728-735. https://doi.org/10.1136/jech.2009.090415 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/jech.2009.090415
Đorđević, D. (2015). Psihološki aspekti kvalitetnih partnerskih odnosa. Beograd: Filozofski fakultet.
Eagly, A. H. (1987). Sex differences in social behavior: A social-role interpretation. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
European Commission. (2024). What is gender-based violence? https://commission.europa.eu/strategy-and-policy/policies/justice-and-fundamental-rights/gender-equality/gender-based-violence/what-gender-based-violence_en
European Institute for Gender Equality (EIGE). (2022). Gender-based violence. https://eige.europa.eu/gender-based-violence
Fajgelj, S. (2013). Psihometrija: metod i teorija psihološkog merenja (IV izdanje). Beograd:Centar za primenjenu psihologiju.
Flood, M. (2015). Work with men to end violence against women: A critical stocktake. Culture, Health & Sexuality, 17(sup2), 159–176. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691058.2015.1070435 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13691058.2015.1070435
Flood, M., & Pease, B. (2009). Factors influencing attitudes to violence against women. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 10(2), 125–142. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524838009334131 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1524838009334131
Gracia, E., & Tomás, J. M. (2014). Correlates of victim-blaming attitudes regarding partner violence against women among the Spanish general population. Violence Against Women, 20(1), 26–41. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801213520577 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801213520577
Gage A. J. (2005). Women’s experience of intimate partner violence in Haiti. Social science & medicine (1982), 61(2), 343–364. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2004.11.078 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2004.11.078
García-Díaz, V., Fernández-Feito, A., Bringas-Molleda, C., Rodríguez-Díaz, F. J., & Lana, A. (2020). Tolerance of intimate partner violence and sexist attitudes among health sciences students from three Spanish universities. Gaceta Sanitaria, 34(2), 179–185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaceta.2019.01.003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaceta.2019.01.003
González, L., & Rodríguez-Planas, N. (2021). Gender norms and intimate partner violence. Labour Economics, 70, 101990. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3892578
Gottman, J., & Silver, N. (1999). The seven principles for making marriage work. New York: Crown Publishers.
Gracia, E., & Herrero, J. (2006). Acceptability of domestic violence against women in the European Union: A multilevel analysis. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 60(2), 123–129. https://doi.org/10.1136/jech.2005.036533 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/jech.2005.036533
Grljak, Đ. (2018). Validation of Serbian adaptation of Authenticity in Relationships Scale (AIRS). Primenjena psihologija, 11(1), 89–104. https://doi.org/10.19090/pp.2018.1.89-104 DOI: https://doi.org/10.19090/pp.2018.1.89-104
Heise, L. (1998). Violence against women: An integrated, ecological framework. Violence Against Women, 4(3), 262–290. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801298004003002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801298004003002
Hentschel, T., Heilman, M. E., & Peus, C. (2019). The multiple dimensions of gender stereotypes: A current look at men’s and women’s characterizations of others and themselves. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00011 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00011
Ignjatović, T. (2011). Porodično nasilje – modeli razumevanja i intervencije. Beograd: Autonomni ženski centar.
Indora, A. (2022). Contextualize the role of media in the propagation of gender stereotypes. Bulletin Monumental, 22(10), 12–26.
Inglehart, R., & Norris, P. (2003). Rising tide: Gender equality and cultural change around the world. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511550362 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511550362
Jarić, V., & Radović, N. (2010). Rečnik rodne ravnopravnosti [Gender equality dictionary]. Beograd: Kancelarija za rodnu ravnopravnost Vlade Republike Srbije.
Jewkes, R., Flood, M., & Lang, J. (2015). From work with men and boys to changes of social norms and reduction of inequities in gender relations: A conceptual shift in prevention of violence against women and girls. The Lancet, 385(9977), 1580–1589. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61683-4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61683-4
Johnson, M. P. (2008). A typology of domestic violence: Intimate terrorism, violent resistance, and situational couple violence. Boston: Northeastern University Press.
Kandiyoti, D. (1988). Bargaining with patriarchy. Gender & Society, 2(3), 274–290. https://doi.org/10.1177/089124388002003004 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/089124388002003004
Kelly, J. B., & Johnson, M. P. (2008). Differentiation among types of intimate partner violence: Research update and implications for interventions. Family Court Review, 46(3), 476–499. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-1617.2008.00215.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-1617.2008.00215.x
Kernis, M. H., & Goldman, B. M. (2006). A multicomponent conceptualization of authenticity: Theory and research. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 38, 283–357. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(06)38006-9 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(06)38006-9
Kiecolt-Glaser, J. K., & Wilson, S. (2017). Lovesick: How couples’ relationships influence health. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 13, 421–443. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-032816-045111 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-032816-045111
King, L. A., & King, D. W. (1990). Role conflict and role ambiguity: A critical assessment of construct validity. Psychological Bulletin, 107(1), 48–64. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.107.1.48 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037//0033-2909.107.1.48
Knight, C. R., & Brinton, M. C. (2017). One egalitarianism or several? Two decades of gender-role change in the United States and Japan. American Journal of Sociology, 122(6), 1869–1905. https://doi.org/10.1086/689814 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/689814
Kokorić, M., Šimunić, A., & Gregov, L. (2014). Stav o bračnim ulogama i percepcija obiteljskih odnosa kod zaposlenih supružnika. Revija za socijalnu politiku, 21(1), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.3935/rsp.v21i1.1138 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3935/rsp.v21i1.1138
Krizsán, A., & Popa, R. M. (2014). Equality policymaking in post-communist Europe. Palgrave Macmillan.
Krug, E. G., Dahlberg, L. L., Mercy, J. A., Zwi, A. B., & Lozano, R. (Eds.). (2002). World report on violence and health. World Health Organization DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(02)11133-0
Lazarus, R. S. (1991). Emotion and adaptation. New York, NY: Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780195069945.001.0001
Lopez, F. G., & Rice, K. G. (2006). Preliminary development and validation of a measure of relationship authenticity. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 53(3), 362–371. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.53.3.362 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.53.3.362
Marks, L. D., & Dollahite, D. C. (2009). Religion, relationships, and responsible fathering in Latter-day Saint families of children with special needs. Family Relations, 58(5), 482–495.
Miller, E., Gillani, B., & O’Donnell, K. (2024). Theories of relational health in interpersonal violence research: A scoping review. Families in Society. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/10443894241227650 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/10443894241227650
Pavlović, M., & Čičkarić, L. (2018). Gender norms and domestic violence in Serbia. Sociološki pregled, 52(3), 975–999.
Perel, E. (2006). Mating in captivity: Unlocking erotic intelligence. New York: Harper Collins.
Perrin, N., Marsh, M., Clough, A., Desgroppes, A., Yope Phanuel, C., Abdi, A., & others. (2019). Social norms and beliefs about gender-based violence scale: A measure for use with gender-based violence prevention programs in low-resource and humanitarian settings. Conflict and Health, 13(1), 6. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13031-019-0189-x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13031-019-0189-x
Peters, J. (2003). Measuring myths about domestic violence: Development and initial validation of the Domestic Violence Myth Acceptance Scale. Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment & Trauma, 7(1–2), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1300/J146v07n01_01 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10926770801917780
Popadić, D. (2011). Psihologija nasilja. Beograd: Zavod za udžbenike.
Raboteć-Šarić, Z. (2002). Stavovi o rodnim ulogama: Skala stavova o rodnim ulogama. U A. Proroković, Z. Penezić, V. Lacković-Grgin, & V. Ćubela (Ur.), Zbirka psihologijskih skala i upitnika, svezak 1 (str. 37–41). Filozofski fakultet u Zadru.
Radcliffe, L. S. (2023). Work–family habits? Exploring the persistence of traditional work–family decision making in dual-earner couples. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 144, 103914. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2023.103914 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2023.103914
Republic of Serbia. (2009). Zakon o ravnopravnosti polova [Law on Gender Equality], Službeni glasnik Republike Srbije, 104/2009.
Rogers, C. R. (1961). On becoming a person: A therapist’s view of psychotherapy. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
Rollero, C., & De Piccoli, N. (2020). Myths about intimate partner violence and moral disengagement: An analysis of sociocultural dimensions sustaining violence against women. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(21), 8139. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17218139 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17218139
Santoniccolo, F., Trombetta, T., Paradiso, M. N., & Rollè, L. (2023). Gender and Media Representations: A Review of the Literature on Gender Stereotypes, Objectification and Sexualization. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 20(10), 5770. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20105770 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20105770
Seligman, M. E. P. (2002). Authentic happiness: Using the new positive psychology to realize your potential for lasting fulfillment. New York: Free Press.
Soković, S., & Ranđelović, V. (2024). Domestic violence in rural Serbia: Etiological-phenomenological approach. NBP. Nauka, bezbednost, policija, 29(2), 108-119. https://doi.org/10.5937/nabepo29-49005 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5937/nabepo29-49005
Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In W. G. Austin & S. Worchel (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33–47). Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole
Tošić, J., & Todorović, J. (2011). Rodne uloge i stavovi prema nasilju u porodici. Sociološki pregled, 45(3), 421–440. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5937/socpreg1103393T
United Nations General Assembly. (1993). Declaration on the Elimination of Violence against Women (A/RES/48/104). United Nations.
USAID. (2020). Gender Analysis for the Western Balkans. United States Agency for International Development. https://banyanglobal.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/USAID-Serbia-Final-Gender-Analysis-Report.pdf
VinagreGonzález, A. M., PuenteLópez, E., AguilarCárceles, M. M., AparicioGarcía, M. E., & Loinaz, I. (2023).Differences between men and women in the acceptance of gender roles and stereotypes in intimate partner violence. Revista Iberoamericana de Psicología y Salud. DOI: https://doi.org/10.23923/j.rips.2023.02.068
Waltermaurer, E. (2012). Public justification of intimate partner violence: A review of the literature. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 13(3), 167–175. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524838012447699 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1524838012447699
Wattson, S. (2023). Online abuse of women: an interdisciplinary scoping review of the literature. Feminist Media Studies, 24(1), 51–69. https://doi.org/10.1080/14680777.2023.2181136 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14680777.2023.2181136
Watts, C., & Zimmerman, C. (2002). Violence against women: Global scope and magnitude. The Lancet, 359(9313), 1232–1237. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(02)08221-1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(02)08221-1
World Health Organization. (2013). Global and regional estimates of violence against women: Prevalence and health effects of intimate partner violence and non-partner sexual violence. WHO. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241564625
World Health Organization. (2021). Violence against women prevalence estimates, 2018: Global, regional and national prevalence estimates for intimate partner violence against women and global and regional prevalence estimates for non-partner sexual violence against women. WHO.
Yodanis, C. (2004). Gender inequality, violence against women, and fear: A cross-national test of the feminist theory of violence against women. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 19(6), 655–675. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260504263868 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260504263868
Zlatanović, S. (2022). Everyday practices of gender in the Serbian community of post-war South-East Kosovo. Genealogy, 6(4), 78. https://doi.org/10.3390/genealogy6040078 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/genealogy6040078
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Categories
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Olivera B. Radović, Zvezdan M. Arsić, Dragana Z. Stanojević

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Plaudit
Accepted 2025-12-14
Published 2025-12-20


