www.ijcrsee.com

439

Alipina, K., et al. (2025). Development of Scientific Writing and Communication Skills in the Context of Forestry Research,

International Journal of Cognitive Research in Science, Engineering and Education (IJCRSEE), 13(2), 439-453.

Original scientific paper

Received: May 17, 2025.

Revised: August 12, 2025.

Accepted: August 18, 2025.

UDC:

001.891:630*64

10.23947/2334-8496-2025-13-2-439-453

Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

Corresponding author:

zhtergenbaeva@vku.edu.kz

Abstract: This article is devoted to the investigation and experimental validation of a model for developing scientific

writing and communication skills among students majoring in “Forestry”. The study included a scientometric analysis of scientific

publications using CiteSpace software, which revealed key areas of research such as argumentation, inquiry-based writing,

scientific communication, and metacognitive components. In parallel with the analytical work, a pedagogical experiment was

carried out, involving students from both experimental and control groups. The skills were assessed across eight aspects: for-

mulation of the scientific problem, text structuring, source citation, clarity and logical coherence, use of scientific vocabulary, data

interpretation, visualization of results, and justification of conclusions. The results demonstrated a significant improvement (on

average, 35%) in all components among students in the experimental group, while the control group showed minimal changes.

This confirms the effectiveness of the practice-oriented model, integrated into the educational process through research-based

tasks. The findings can be applied in the development of educational programs and methods for training forestry specialists.

Keywords: scientific writing, scientific communication, research competencies, CiteSpace, forestry education,

pedagogical experiment.

Kuralay Alipina

, Zhuldyz Tergenbayeva

* , Zhadyra Kabatayeva

, Zukhra Bolatbekovna

Nazerke Amangeldi

, Dautova Zukhra

Sarsen Amanzholov East Kazakhstan University, Ust-Kamenogorsk, Republic of Kazakhstan, e-mail:

alipina_87@mail.ru

Sarsen Amanzholov East Kazakhstan University, Department оf Biology, Republic оf Kazakhstan

e-mail: zhtergenbaeva@vku.edu.kz, zhkabataeva@vku.edu.kz

Lecturer Department of Biology, Republic of Kazakhstan, e-mail: bagimbayevaz@mail.ru,

Lecturer of The Biology Department, Sarsen Amanzholov East Kazakhstan University,

(Ust-Kamenogorsk City, Republic of Kazakhstan), e-mail: nazerke.amangeldi.m@gmail.com

Sarsen Amanzholov East Kazakhstan University, Department of Chemistry, Republic оf Kazakhstan,

e-mail:

zdautova@vku.edu.kz

Development of Scientific Writing and Communication Skills in the

Context of Forestry Research

Introduction

Relevance and problem statement

In recent years, the term “scientific writing and communication” has been increasingly used in the

scientific and educational environment to refer to the set of skills necessary for the effective presentation

and dissemination of research results. The development of these skills is becoming particularly important

in the context of increasing demands on academic publication activity and the rapid development of the

digital environment of scientific interaction.

In the context of the modernization of education and the emphasis on practice-oriented learning,

the formation of students’ research competencies is becoming an integral part of staff training. It is espe-

cially important to develop students’ ability to clearly and logically present the results of scientific activity,

use accepted standards of scientific design, interact with the professional community, and form analytical

and reasoned texts. All this contributes not only to improving the quality of specialist training, but also to

their integration into the international scientific space.

This work is aimed at studying approaches to the development of scientific writing and communi-

cation skills among students involved in research, as well as at identifying relevant areas and scientific

www.ijcrsee.com

440

Alipina, K., et al. (2025). Development of Scientific Writing and Communication Skills in the Context of Forestry Research,

International Journal of Cognitive Research in Science, Engineering and Education (IJCRSEE), 13(2), 439-453.

clusters in this field. The research examines both pedagogical strategies (PBL, PBL, STEM, inquiry-based

learning) and digital tools that contribute to the formation of written and oral scientific speech.

Despite the growing interest in the development of scientific writing and communication in general,

there is a clear shortage of research on this topic in the context of forestry and the training of forestry

specialists. This conclusion is confirmed by the results of a scientometric analysis of publications indexed

in the Web of Science database conducted using CiteSpace software (

Chen, 2006). The analysis showed

that the key terms “scientific writing”, “science communication”, and “academic writing” are mostly found in

publications related to medicine, engineering, general pedagogy, and biology. At the same time, publica-

tions related to forestry education or forest science students are presented in fragments and do not form

stable scientific clusters.

In this regard, there is a need for a comprehensive analysis of existing pedagogical approaches, as

well as the development and implementation of models that contribute to the effective formation of students’

scientific communication skills within the framework of real research projects. This study seeks to fill the

identified scientific and practical gap, relying both on scientometric analysis using CiteSpace and on experi-

mental testing of a practice-oriented model for the formation of scientific writing among forestry students.

The state of educational programs in the field of forestry in Kazakhstan

Despite the existence of educational programs in the field of forestry in Kazakhstan, the quality of

specialist training faces certain challenges. More than 100 forestry specialists graduate in Kazakhstan eve-

ry year. According to the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Republic of Kazakhstan, about

60% of university graduates do not work in their specialty, which indicates that there is no link between

personnel training and the economic needs of the region (Zakon.kz, n.d.). Those who get a job in the field

of forestry are often not involved in research activities, as this is not provided for by their job responsibili-

ties. A significant part of forestry workers do not have specialized education, which is due to low wages and

lack of social support, which reduce the attractiveness of work in this industry (Ishekenova, 2024).

According to the data of the National Chamber of Entrepreneurs of the Republic of Kazakhstan

“Atameken”, educational programs in the direction of B079 “Forestry” are implemented in 8 universities

located in 7 cities of the country (Atameken, n.d.). However, such programs are mainly focused on theo-

retical disciplines, and practical training is limited to short periods of academic and industrial practice.

Foreign experience in training specialists

In developed countries, educational programs in the field of forestry are based on the close integra-

tion of scientific research, practice and innovation. Students are involved in project activities, ecosystem

monitoring, laboratory work, and modeling of natural processes. Special attention is paid to critical think-

ing, interdisciplinary approach and academic writing as part of the educational paradigm. This approach

allows future specialists to be prepared for the challenges of sustainable natural resource management

(

University of British Columbia, 2024).

Approaches to the formation of scientific writing and communication

The development of scientific writing and communication skills is a prerequisite for the professional

growth of future scientists and specialists. Effective scientific communication promotes integration into

the academic community, participation in international projects and the promotion of scientific results in

society (

Brownell, Price, and Steinman, 2013; Faber et al., 2024).

Structured educational programs play an important role in the formation of these competencies. One

example is the Scientific Communication program, which is based on the principles of high-level thinking

training (HOLS) and supports the development of clear presentation and argumentation skills (Scherz,

Spektor-Levy, and Eylon, 2005; Suparman and Darmawan, 2022; Juarez and Kenet, 2018). Academic

writing courses are increasingly being introduced in universities, where students learn to formulate hypoth-

eses, structure articles, and prepare scientific reports. Additionally, resources such as The Craft of Scien-

tific Communication provide practical tools for improving academic writing skills (Harmon and Gross, n.d.).

The inclusion of such courses in undergraduate and graduate programs contributes to improving

the quality of education, particularly in the context of globalizing scientific knowledge. Programs at institu-

tions like Duke University and Stanford effectively integrate theoretical foundations with practical assign-

www.ijcrsee.com

441

Alipina, K., et al. (2025). Development of Scientific Writing and Communication Skills in the Context of Forestry Research,

International Journal of Cognitive Research in Science, Engineering and Education (IJCRSEE), 13(2), 439-453.

ments and publication training (Willems-Jones et al., 2019; Jude, 2017).

Integration of students into real scientific research

The integration of students into real scientific research is a transformative educational approach that pro-

motes deeper learning and engagement in science (Dounas-Frazer, Ríos, and Lewandowski, 2019). Programs

such as Students as Researchers (STARs) enable students to conduct proactive research in both school and

university settings, fostering responsibility and sustained interest in scientific work (Silverman, 2012).

Authentic forms of research—such as research internships, student-teacher-scientist partnerships,

field-based practices, and participation in citizen science—facilitate student comprehension of scientific

methodology, critical thinking, and data analysis skills (Okhotina and Belonogova, 2021; Edwards et al.,

2007; Bailenson, 2013; Strogetskaya and Betiger, 2024; Anop and Petruk, 2014; Ovsepyan, 2019).

STEM-based strategies, integration of project activities, and experiential learning approaches fur-

ther enhance student engagement and prepare them for professional scientific practice (Kanematsu and

Barry, 2016; Jackson, 2013).

Using CiteSpace to analyze scientific clusters

CiteSpace software, a tool for citation analysis and visualization of scientific information, was used

to identify directions and trends in the research field. This tool enables the tracking of key publications

forming scientific clusters, identification of highly cited authors, and construction of co-authorship net-

works (

Chen, 2006; Chen, 2020; Chen et al., 2010).

The conducted scientometric analysis showed that the most active research on the topic of scientific com-

munication is concentrated in the fields of medicine, pedagogy, and engineering. Topics related to the training of

forestry students are poorly represented and require further development in both research and applied aspects.

Materials and Methods

A. Data sources

For the scientometric analysis, data from the Web of Science Core Collection (WOSCC) database,

an authoritative international source of scientific information, including peer-reviewed publications, was

used. The sample included publications from the Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)

and Emerging Sources Citation Index (ESCI), as they cover a wide range of disciplines, including educa-

tion, ecology, forestry, and interdisciplinary research.

The search for publications was conducted in March 2025 through the advanced Web of Science

interface. To improve the accuracy of the sample, the logical operators AND, OR, as well as a phrasal

search in quotation marks “...” were used. Queries were applied to the following fields of publications:

Title, Abstract, and Author Keywords. This made it possible to identify works that address the topics of

scientific writing and communication in the context of forestry education.

Examples of search queries:

1. “scientific writing” OR “science communication” AND “forestry education”;

2. (“academic writing” OR “research skills”) AND (“forestry educatio” OR “environmental education”).

The following terms were used as keywords:

scientific writing, science communication, academic writing, research skills, student engagement,

forestry education, environmental education, scientific literature, publication ethics, STEM communication.

The analysis period covers 2021-2024. The data for 2025 were excluded from the analysis be-

cause they were not yet fully available in the Web of Science database at the time of the analysis.

Criteria for inclusion of publications:

• the language of publication is English;

• type of publications - original articles, reviews, editorial materials, conference abstracts, letters;

• full-text accessibility and relevance to the research topic.

As a result of applying these criteria, the analysis included 77 publications corresponding to the

intersection of scientific writing and educational practices in the field of forestry. All selected publications

www.ijcrsee.com

442

Alipina, K., et al. (2025). Development of Scientific Writing and Communication Skills in the Context of Forestry Research,

International Journal of Cognitive Research in Science, Engineering and Education (IJCRSEE), 13(2), 439-453.

were exported to a CiteSpace-compatible format for further analysis of scientific clusters, terms, author

networks, and time trends.

B. Analysis tool

To analyze the scientific literature, CiteSpace software was used, which is specifically designed to

visualize and analyze structural relationships between scientific publications (

Chen, 2006). CiteSpace en-

ables the identification of key clusters, influential authors, dominant topics, and emerging trends through

co-citation and temporal analysis.

The following functions were used in the research:

• clusterization of scientific publications;

• analysis of citation spikes;

• assessment of the centrality of nodes in the network (by degree and by intermediacy);

• calculation of Sigma, a significance indicator that combines citation and centrality;

• building thematic and author networks.

• Analysis Parameters:

• type of analysis: co-citation;

• the level of analysis: document – author – keywords;

• intervals: 1 year each;

• cluster labeling method: LLC, LSI, MI;

• minimum citation threshold: 3;

• visualization is saved in PNG format.

C. Methodological justification

The application of the scientometric approach with the help of CiteSpace has allowed:

• to systematize existing publications;

• identify key clusters and missing areas;

• to assess the relevance and scientific richness of the topic;

• to substantiate the need for further research in the context of the formation of scientific research com-

petencies among students of forestry.

Table 1. Search queries

Source Web of Science Core Collection

Citation databases SCI-EXPANDED, ESCI

Time coverage 2021 – 2025

Language English

Document types Article

Search stages Search query

#1 TS = (“scientific writing” OR “academic writing” OR “science communication” OR “re-

search writing” OR “scientific literacy” OR “publication literacy” OR “research com-

munication” OR “writing skills” OR “presentation skills” OR “academic discourse” OR

“research competence”)

#2 TS = (“forestry education” OR “forest science” OR “forest research” OR “forestry

students” OR “environmental education” OR “natural resources education” OR “for-

est ecology” OR “sustainable forestry”)

#3 #1 AND #2

Note: #1 - the stage of literature search on scientic writing and communication;

#2 - the stage of searching for literature related to forestry and research;

#3 - a combined query to identify relevant publications at the intersection of the two directions.

www.ijcrsee.com

443

Alipina, K., et al. (2025). Development of Scientific Writing and Communication Skills in the Context of Forestry Research,

International Journal of Cognitive Research in Science, Engineering and Education (IJCRSEE), 13(2), 439-453.

Statistical analysis

The data were obtained from the Web of Science (WOS) database in the “Full Record” and “Cited

References” formats in March 2025. The final sample consisted of 77 publications, which were carefully

checked for duplicates, preprocessed, and then imported into CiteSpace software—an advanced platform

for documentary data mining and visualization developed by the team of Chaomei Chen (

Chen, 2006).

The CiteSpace program combines the methods of social network analysis and cluster analysis,

which provides the construction of structural and thematic maps of scientific publications. The analysis

examined fundamental knowledge, limitations in research, key topics, the evolution of trends, as well as

networks of scientific collaboration, networks of co-authorship and citation.

To ensure reproducibility and reliability of the analysis, the network reduction and filtering param-

eters used (in particular, the Pathfinder method) were fixed. The CiteSpace 5.8 R1 version was used in

the work, which allowed for consistent and reliable processing of the collected data.

Research Methodology

Based on the analysis of scientific literature and modern pedagogical approaches, a practice-

oriented model for the formation of students’ research competencies in the field of “Forestry” has been

developed and tested. The model combines theoretical and practical components and is aimed at devel-

oping the skills of scientific writing, communication and independent research activities.

The model includes the following stages: organizational, theoretical, practical, final and effective-

ness assessment stages. During the implementation process, the methods of field research, project work,

scientific writing, as well as methods of self-reflection and expert assessment were used.

The aim of the research is to substantiate and implement a model that promotes the formation of

research competencies among students in the framework of educational and scientific activities.

Objectives:

• to analyze methodological approaches to the formation of research competencies;

• to develop a step-by-step structural model;

• to integrate the model into the educational process in the field of “Forestry”;

• to conduct a pedagogical experiment and evaluate its effectiveness.

Table 2. Description of the model

№ Stage Contents

1 Organizational Formation of control and experimental groups

2 Theoretical Seminars on scientific writing, data analysis and preparation of scientific texts

3 Practical Field trips (core collection, analysis of annual rings, visual inspection of trees)

4 Final Conducting a scientific seminar with a presentation of the results, discussion

5 Effectiveness assessment

Scales of assessment of motivation, cognitive, procedural, practical and reflexive

components are used (see below)

To strengthen the academic part, a new discipline was introduced, the work curriculum “Organiza-

tion and planning of research work”, in which students mastered the tools of scientific writing, methods of

publication activity and the basics of research ethics.

Diagnostic and assessment methods

To assess the formation of students’ research competencies, a set of diagnostic methods was

used, covering motivational, cognitive, procedural, practical and reflexive components.

1. Motivational component.

To measure the level of educational and research motivation, A. Mehrabian’s modified methodol-

ogy was used, adapted to the educational context. It allowed us to determine the students’ internal attitude

towards achieving academic and scientific goals.

www.ijcrsee.com

444

Alipina, K., et al. (2025). Development of Scientific Writing and Communication Skills in the Context of Forestry Research,

International Journal of Cognitive Research in Science, Engineering and Education (IJCRSEE), 13(2), 439-453.

2. Cognitive component

The assessment of the level of intellectual development and the ability to think scientifically was

carried out using a mental development test (intellectual diagnostics) aimed at identifying logical, analyti-

cal and abstract thinking.

3. Procedural and practical components

To diagnose the ability to plan and perform research activities, the following methods were used:

• expert assessment of research and project work (abstracts, reports, posters);

• results of students’ participation in competitions and scientific conferences;

• monitoring the implementation of practical tasks;

• analysis of laboratory and field work results;

• special professionally oriented tests aimed at testing applied research skills.

4. Reflexive component

The level of awareness of one’s own research path and self-assessment of skills was monitored using

the S.A. Budassi self-assessment methodology, which includes scales of reflection and professional orientation.

Experiment

The pedagogical experiment was conducted within the framework of the scientific project AP25794101

“Study of the influence of technogenic factors and climate change on tree species growing in industrial re-

gions of Eastern Kazakhstan using the dendroindication method” (2025–2027), implemented under the

grant funding program “Zhas Galym” of the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Republic of

Kazakhstan. The project is coordinated by postdoctoral researcher K.B. Alipina and covers both forestry

and environmental aspects of sustainable nature management. The students involved in the project had the

opportunity to participate in real scientific research, which ensured the practical application of the model.

The participants of the experiment

129 students participated in the experiment. The Experimental group (EG) included students in-

volved in research and field activities. The Control group (CG) was trained according to the traditional

program. The details are provided in table 3.

Table 3. Number of students in the Experimental and Control groups

University Course

Experimental Control

Male students

Female

students

Male students

Female

students

S. Amanzholov East Kazakhstan

University

2 5 18 5 17

S. Amanzholov East Kazakhstan

University

3 3 19 4 17

D. Serikbayev East Kazakhstan

Technical University

2 9 5 11 4

D. Serikbayev East Kazakhstan

Technical University

3 4 2 3 3

Total 65 64

Stages of the pedagogical experiment

1. Ascertaining stage: determining the initial level of research competencies;

2. Formative stage: model implementation, participation in field work, seminars on scientific writing,

project assignments;

3. Control stage: final diagnostics, project protection and analysis of the dynamics of competence

development.

www.ijcrsee.com

445

Alipina, K., et al. (2025). Development of Scientific Writing and Communication Skills in the Context of Forestry Research,

International Journal of Cognitive Research in Science, Engineering and Education (IJCRSEE), 13(2), 439-453.

Criteria for assessing effectiveness

• motivational – interest in scientific activity;

• cognitive – knowledge and understanding of the scientific process;

• procedural – the ability to perform the stages of research;

• practical – the ability to apply research methods;

• reflexive – the ability to introspect and evaluate results.

Methods of processing the results: Student’s t-test, correlation analysis (the relationship between

activity level and diagnostic results).

Results and Discussion

A. Geographical distribution of publication activity in the field of scientific writing

and communication

As part of this study, a scientometric analysis of publications indexed in the Web of Science Core Col-

lection (WOSCC) database was conducted using CiteSpace software (version 6.1.R6). The sample includes

publications for the period from 2021 to March 2025, corresponding to the topics “scientific writing”, “academ-

ic writing”, “science communication”, “research skills”, “forestry education” and “environmental education”.

The key countries were identified based on the affiliations of the authors of the publications se-

lected by an extended search query in the fields Title, Abstract and Author Keywords. Each country was

ranked by the number of publications and the number of citations. The analytical sample included 77 pub-

lications that meet the search criteria. CiteSpace allowed us to identify the countries whose researchers

have made the greatest contribution to the development of the topic, and automatically distributed them

into thematic clusters.

The study included publications indexed in the Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)

and Social Sciences Citation Index (SSCI) databases included in the Web of Science Core Collection (WO-

SCC). The sample includes original scientific articles, review articles, editorial materials, conference materi-

als, and scientific notes. The Scopus database was not used in the analysis. When calculating bibliometric

indicators, the citation of individual publications was taken into account, rather than journals as a whole.

Spain has demonstrated sustained activity (4 citations, cluster № 6), especially in the development

of written scientific communication. Australia (3 citations, cluster № 2), Mexico and Germany (2 citations

each) also demonstrated involvement in the topic related to student participation in scientific publications

and educational projects. The participation of France, South Africa, Ukraine and Switzerland is interesting,

each of which appears in the network as an important participant in individual clusters.

In terms of centrality, Switzerland showed the highest value (0.14, cluster № 0), which indicates its

role as a link between various research topics and areas. This is followed by Germany (0.06) and Mexico

(0.05), which also play an important role in the formation and dissemination of scientific information.

Index of Sigma - reflecting a combination of citation bursts and centrality - amounted to 1.00 in all

the leading countries, including Switzerland, Germany, USA, Russia, China, Spain, Australia and others.

This highlights the equal importance of their contributions to the subject under study.

Nevertheless, when analyzing the content of the publications, it was found that not a single study

has been identified that is directly related to the development of scientific writing and communication skills

specifically in the context of forestry. This indicates a clear gap in international research practice and

underlines the relevance of the tasks set in this work.

Thus, the results obtained reflect global involvement in the development of academic literacy and

scientific writing, but at the same time indicate the need to form a new direction focused on training spe-

cialists in the field of forestry with a high level of research and communication competencies.

www.ijcrsee.com

446

Alipina, K., et al. (2025). Development of Scientific Writing and Communication Skills in the Context of Forestry Research,

International Journal of Cognitive Research in Science, Engineering and Education (IJCRSEE), 13(2), 439-453.

2021 2022 2023 2024 2025

Number of publications

USA

RUSSIA

PEOPLES R CHINA

SPAIN

AUSTRALIA

ENGLAND

UKRAINE

BRAZIL

BULGARIA

FRANCE

GERMANY

GREECE

KAZAKHSTAN

MEXICO

NETHERLANDS

Figure 1. Analysis of the cluster of distribution countries (Atameken, n.d.)

B. Thematic areas related to scientific writing and communication

1) Main research directions

Figure 2 is a graph of the common occurrence of keywords, in which each node corresponds to a

specific term related to scientific writing, academic and research training. The size of the nodes reflects

the importance of the keywords, and the links between them indicate the frequency of their sharing in

scientific publications. Cluster analysis technology using the Pathfinder pruning method was used to visu-

alize the structure of thematic areas.

Based on the data analysis, six main clusters were identified, reflecting the dominant trends in the

scientific literature. The largest cluster (cluster #0) covers keywords such as “scientific writing”, “global

research”, “higher education” and “students”, which emphasizes active attention to the issues of preparing

students for research activities in the context of global change. It includes 15 publications and is charac-

terized by a high silhouette coefficient (1.0), which indicates its high coherence.

The second largest cluster (#1) is associated with the topics “scientific communication” and “plant

science”, reflecting an interest in the development of scientific communication in the context of crop pro-

duction and, in our case, can be interpreted as related to environmental education and popularization of

climate change and forest conditions.

Cluster #2 is associated with supporting the development of students’ research skills, especially in

biomedical sciences, which resonates with the environmental aspects of adaptation of living organisms to

external influences, including technogenic factors.

Cluster #6 also deserves attention, which includes such important aspects as “critical thinking”,

“communication skill” and “argument driven inquiry” - the skills necessary to analyze the effects of climate

and anthropogenic changes on tree ecosystems, especially in the process of preparing research students.

The cluster analysis data indicate that topics related to scientific writing, critical thinking, student

research, and forestry are actively developing and are of high importance in the context of modern sci-

entific research. This underlines the importance of developing an interdisciplinary approach in teaching

the integration of methods of analyzing climatic and technogenic factors into the educational process,

especially in the framework of training specialists in the field of forestry.

www.ijcrsee.com

447

Alipina, K., et al. (2025). Development of Scientific Writing and Communication Skills in the Context of Forestry Research,

International Journal of Cognitive Research in Science, Engineering and Education (IJCRSEE), 13(2), 439-453.

Figure 2. Keyword network based on articles published between 2021 and 2025 (Chen et al., 2010)

C. The intellectual structure of scientific writing and communication

To visualize the intellectual structure of the area under study, CiteSpace software was used, based

on the methods of analyzing the citation and co-authorship of scientific literature indexed in the Web of

Science Core Collection database for the period 2021-2025.

Despite the stated time interval, the analysis covers only publications for 2021-2024. This is due to the

fact that at the time of the search (March 2025), publications for 2025 that meet the selection criteria were not

fully presented in the WOSCC database. Thus, the results reflect the intellectual picture of the research area

as of the end of 2024, which should be taken into account when interpreting the obtained clusters and trends.

Each time “slice” was based on the publications of the corresponding year. The network was cleaned

using the Pathfinder algorithm, which reduced information noise and increased visualization clarity. The

resulting map demonstrates the evolution of this field and identifies key thematic areas and research fronts.

Each node on the graph represents a cited article, and the lines between them represent cases of

their joint citation. The size of the nodes corresponds to the frequency of citations, and the purple ring indi-

cates a high degree of betweenness centrality, which indicates the importance of the publication as a bridge

between different topics. The red rings indicate “citation bursts”, i.e. periods of active attention to the source.

As a result of the analysis, 6 main clusters were identified, each of which represents a separate

area in the field of scientific writing and communication. The clusters were labeled using the methods

LLR (log likelihood ratio), LSI (latent semantic indexing) and MI (mutual information). Cluster silhouette

values range from 0.883 to 1.0, which indicates a high consistency of themes within each cluster. Table 4

provides a summary of the selected clusters.

Table 4. Main clusters of co-cited sources

№

clusters

Size Contour Label (LSI) Label (LLR) Label (MI) Year

1 9 0.90

L1 and L2 writing

learning technologies

Argumentative structuring Argumentative structuring 2021

2 9 0.974 Systematic review Research-based writing learning Courses 2022

3 8 0.982 Argumentation research Science Foreign language 2023

5 7 0.899 Constructive approach Argumentation-based learning Argumentative structuring 2022

6 7 1.00

Laboratory classes in

chemistry

Chemistry laboratories for

students

Teaching 2021

7 7 0.883

Digital literacy and

metacognition

Metacognitive component Metacognitive component 2024

www.ijcrsee.com

448

Alipina, K., et al. (2025). Development of Scientific Writing and Communication Skills in the Context of Forestry Research,

International Journal of Cognitive Research in Science, Engineering and Education (IJCRSEE), 13(2), 439-453.

Figure 3 shows a cluster map of co-authorship of scientific literature on the topic of developing

scientific writing and communication skills. Each cluster displays interconnected publications grouped by

thematic proximity. The color difference indicates the difference in research directions, and the cluster

sizes reflect the amount of scientific activity in the corresponding area.

Figure 3. Cluster map of co-authorship of scientific literature in the field of scientific writing and communication

(Chen et al., 2010)

Most of the clusters shown in Figure 4 are homogeneous, which is confirmed by the high contour

values. The cluster labels were assigned based on keywords extracted from the titles of the cited articles.

Cluster № 1 is devoted to argumentative structuring and reflects students’ interest in metacognitive as-

pects and the formation of rhetorical writing skills. Cluster № 2 includes systematic reviews on the issues

of teaching writing based on a research approach.

Cluster № 3 focuses on the use of scientific argumentation in writing, especially in the context of

interdisciplinary and multilingual education. Cluster № 5 focuses on instructional strategies and the use of

models of learning through argumentation. Clusters № 6 and № 7 are related to laboratory practice and

the development of digital literacy and metacognitive abilities of students in the process of learning writing,

especially in teaching foreign languages.

Thus, the identified clusters form the intellectual basis of the modern trend in the research of scientific

writing and communication, allowing us to trace its evolution, main directions and development prospects.

D. Analysis of betweenness centrality

Betweenness centrality is a measure of the importance of a node in a network, reflecting the

number of shortest paths passing through a given node. Nodes with high centrality play the role of con-

necting elements between different parts of the network and facilitate the transfer of information between

clusters (

Chen, 2006)

In this research using CiteSpace, eight key nodes with the highest centrality have been identified,

which play a structurally important role in cluster unification. These nodes are critically necessary for link-

ing individual clusters and forming an integrated intellectual structure in the field of scientific writing and

communication development.

As shown in Figure 4, the highest value of intermediary centrality belongs to the node “argument

driven inquiry” (0.38), which is part of cluster № 2, which is dedicated to teaching writing based on a

research approach. This is followed by ZOHAR A (0.25) from cluster № 7, and HYLAND K (0.23), also in

cluster № 2. Nodes from clusters № 3 (for example, “students” and “science”) and № 4 (“scientific writ-

ing” and “practical laboratory report”) are of particular interest, since they perform a connecting function

between educational practice, cognitive strategies and scientific communication.

www.ijcrsee.com

449

Alipina, K., et al. (2025). Development of Scientific Writing and Communication Skills in the Context of Forestry Research,

International Journal of Cognitive Research in Science, Engineering and Education (IJCRSEE), 13(2), 439-453.

Figure 4. Chronology of co-citation clusters (Chen et al., 2010)

Thus, nodes with high centrality demonstrate not only quantitative significance (citation frequency),

but also qualitative significance in the context of their ability to connect key research areas in the field of

academic writing, argumentation, and interdisciplinary learning.

E. The results of the pedagogical experiment

As part of the pedagogical experiment, the effectiveness of the proposed model for the formation

of research competencies among students studying in the field of “Forestry” was evaluated. The results

of the control stage demonstrated a statistically significant increase in the level of formation of target

competencies among the participants of the experimental group. In particular, more than 35% of EG stu-

dents demonstrated stable skills in scientific writing, basic data analysis, and the application of field and

laboratory research methods.

The total sample of the research consisted of 129 2nd-3rd year undergraduate students from two

higher education institutions in East Kazakhstan:

• S. Amanzholov East Kazakhstan University, Department of Biology, Higher School of IT and Natural

Sciences;

• D. Serikbayev East Kazakhstan Technical University, Higher School of Earth Sciences.

Two groups were formed:

• Experimental group (EG) - 65 students (21 boys, 44 girls) who participated in research activities;

• Control group (CG) - 64 students (23 boys, 41 girls) studying according to the standard program with-

out additional research practice.

The pedagogical experiment was conducted in 2025 as part of the implementation of the scientific

project AP25794101 to study the influence of technogenic factors and climate change on tree species

growing in the industrial regions of Eastern Kazakhstan using the dendroindication method, funded by the

Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Republic of Kazakhstan under the grant program “Zhas

Galym” (2025-2027). The project was coordinated by postdoctoral researcher K.B. Alipina. and it provided

for the active involvement of students in the stages of field and laboratory research.

The students of the experimental group were trained in the discipline “Organization and planning

of research work”, which includes:

• fundamentals of scientific writing and publication compilation;

• research design and planning;

• ethical aspects of scientific activity;

• participation in field trips, core collection, analysis of annual rings.

The assessment of the formation of scientific research competencies among students was car-

www.ijcrsee.com

450

Alipina, K., et al. (2025). Development of Scientific Writing and Communication Skills in the Context of Forestry Research,

International Journal of Cognitive Research in Science, Engineering and Education (IJCRSEE), 13(2), 439-453.

ried out in three stages: ascertaining, forming and controlling, in accordance with the developed model.

The diagnosis included five components previously described in the methodology section: motivational,

cognitive, procedural, practical, and reflexive. At the same time, the main attention at the control stage

was paid to the dynamics of the growth of indicators in the experimental group compared with the control

group. The data obtained indicate significant differences in all components, especially in practical and

motivational ones, which indicates the effectiveness of the implemented model.

The statistical analysis was performed manually based on the calculation of the Student’s t-test and

the Pearson correlation coefficient using formulas in spreadsheets. Graphs and tables built in Microsoft

Excel were used to visualize the results.

The assessment of the development of scientific writing and communication skills was carried out

in a number of key aspects reflecting the structure and content of the scientific text. The following compo-

nents were selected as evaluation criteria:

1. Formulation of a scientific problem - the ability to clearly and reasonably present the problem under study;

2. Text structuring - logical and consistent design of scientific work sections;

3. Citation of sources - the correctness of the use of scientific sources and the observance of academic integrity;

4. Clarity and logic of presentation - consistency of argumentation and clarity of presentation of the material;

5. Use of scientific vocabulary - proficiency in terminology and style of academic writing;

6. Data interpretation - the ability to analyze the results obtained and draw informed conclusions;

7. Visualization of results - the ability to present information in the form of graphs, tables, and other

visual forms;

8. Justification of conclusions - the logical conclusion of the study based on the data obtained.

Figure 5. Comparison of scientific writing and data analysis skills development

In the control group, progress in all aspects was insignificant or minimal - from 0% to 4%, which

indicates the absence of targeted pedagogical influence.

In the experimental group, there is a steady increase in education in all aspects from 35% to 37%,

which reflects the effectiveness of the implemented model of scientific writing and communication based

on research activities.

The greatest increase was recorded in terms of indicators:

• citation of sources;

• interpretation of data;

• formulation of a scientific problem.

This suggests that the integration of research activities into the learning process significantly en-

hances the academic and communicative competencies of students.

www.ijcrsee.com

451

Alipina, K., et al. (2025). Development of Scientific Writing and Communication Skills in the Context of Forestry Research,

International Journal of Cognitive Research in Science, Engineering and Education (IJCRSEE), 13(2), 439-453.

The effectiveness of the pedagogical experiment in each aspect of scientific writing and communi-

cation according to formulas:

The participants of the experimental group improved their scientific writing and communication

skills by 27.65% compared to the baseline level. This indicates the high effectiveness of the applied teach-

ing methodology, as target competencies have been strengthened by almost a third.

Net efficiency = (Growth in EG) - (Growth in CG)

Net efficiency = 0.75 - (2.475 - 2.575) = 0.75 - (-0.1) = 0.85

The net increase in results in the experimental group exceeded the control group by 0.85 points,

which confirms that the positive changes were caused precisely by the experimental intervention, and not

by external factors.

Although the coefficient turned out to be numerically negative, this is due to the fact that there was

a deterioration in the results in the control group. In such cases, the negative value of E is interpreted as

a strong positive effectiveness of the experiment, since the EG improved the results, and the CG, on the

contrary, decreased.

The pedagogical experiment turned out to be successful and effective: the growth of scientific writ-

ing and communication skills in the experimental group was significant, the improvements were confirmed

by objective calculations, and the dynamics of the control group excluded external influence.

These findings align with international research emphasizing the value of integrating scientific writ-

ing with ecological and project-based learning. For example, Septriana, Suwandi, and Sumarwati (2025)

demonstrated that project-based learning combined with ecological literacy significantly improves stu-

dents’ scientific writing competencies.

Similarly, Hajdarpasic, Brew, and Popenici (2015) stressed that involving students in authentic re-

search activities strengthens their academic engagement and scientific reasoning. This reinforces the ob-

served gains in our experimental group, particularly in motivation and the formulation of scientific arguments.

Moreover, Zimmerman et al. (2006) found that visual and animated communication tools enhance

public understanding of forestry practices, supporting our use of graphs and visual data presentations in

student projects.

Finally, the effectiveness of applied and community-oriented forestry education was confirmed in

the work of

Parajuli et al. (2020), where practical engagement strategies helped participants better under-

stand sustainable forest-based economic models. These international parallels confirm the relevance and

adaptability of the proposed model in forestry education contexts.

www.ijcrsee.com

452

Alipina, K., et al. (2025). Development of Scientific Writing and Communication Skills in the Context of Forestry Research,

International Journal of Cognitive Research in Science, Engineering and Education (IJCRSEE), 13(2), 439-453.

Conclusion

This study comprehensively examined the formation of scientific writing and communication skills

among forestry students through a dual methodology: (1) a scientometric analysis of international pub-

lication trends, and (2) an experimental application of a pedagogical model within two universities in

Kazakhstan. The bibliometric analysis using CiteSpace software identified key thematic clusters and geo-

graphical activity areas in research on academic communication, emphasizing a gap in forestry-related

contexts. Despite global engagement with scientific writing and STEM pedagogy, forestry education re-

mains underrepresented in this domain, indicating the novelty and necessity of the current work.

To address this gap, a practice-oriented model integrating scientific writing, field research, and

interdisciplinary learning was developed and piloted. The pedagogical experiment demonstrated statisti-

cally significant improvements in students’ competencies, especially in the formulation of scientific prob-

lems, data interpretation, and academic writing conventions. The average improvement of 27.65% and a

net effectiveness of 0.85 points confirm the success of the intervention.

These findings contribute to the growing body of literature on research-based learning and un-

derscore the need for curriculum modernization in forestry education, especially in Kazakhstan. Future

research should explore longitudinal impacts of such pedagogical approaches, as well as their integra-

tion into broader environmental education frameworks. Additionally, international collaborations could en-

hance the scalability and contextual adaptability of the model.

Acknowledgments

The experimental part of the research was carried out as part of a scientific project funded by the

Science Committee of the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Republic of Kazakhstan. Grant

№ AP25794101 “Study of the influence of technogenic factors and climate change on tree species grow-

ing in industrial regions of Eastern Kazakhstan using the dendroindication method”.

Within the framework of this project, students participated in practice-oriented research, which cre-

ated favorable conditions for the development of their scientific writing and academic communication in a

real research context.

Conflict of interests

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, K. Alipina; methodology, K. Alipina; supervision, K. Alipina; writing—original

draft preparation, K. Alipina; project administration, Zh. Tergenbayeva; writing—review and editing, Zh.

Tergenbayeva and Z. Dautova; validation, Zh. Kabatayeva; data curation, K. Alipina and Zh. Kabatayeva;

formal analysis, Z. Bolatbekovna; visualization, Z. Bolatbekovna; investigation, N. Amangeldi; resources,

N. Amangeldi; proofreading and English language editing, Z. Dautova. All authors have read and agreed

to the published version of the manuscript.

References

Anop, M. F., & Petruk, G. V. (2014). Ways to attract young people to scientic research. Modern High-Tech Technolo-

gies, (7-1), 14–16. https://top-technologies.ru/ru/article/view?id=34163

Bailenson, J. N. (2013). Keynote speaker: Innite reality: Avatars, eternal life, new worlds, and the dawn of the virtual revolu-

tion. IEEE Virtual Reality Conference. https://doi.org/10.1109/VR.2013.6549341

Brownell, S. E., Price, J. V., & Steinman, L. (2013). Science communication to the general public: Why we need to teach un-

dergraduate and graduate students this skill as part of their formal scientic training. Journal of Undergraduate

Neuroscience Education, 12(1). https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3852879/

Chen, C. (2004). Searching for intellectual turning points: Progressive knowledge domain visualization. PNAS, 101(sup-

pl_1), 5303–5310. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0307513100

www.ijcrsee.com

453

Alipina, K., et al. (2025). Development of Scientific Writing and Communication Skills in the Context of Forestry Research,

International Journal of Cognitive Research in Science, Engineering and Education (IJCRSEE), 13(2), 439-453.

Chen, C. (2006). CiteSpace II: Detecting and visualizing emerging trends and transient patterns in scientic literature. Jour-

nal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 57(3), 359–377. https://doi.

org/10.1002/asi.20317

Chen, C. (2017). Science mapping: A systematic review of the literature. Journal of Data and Information Science,

2(2), 1–40. https://doi.org/10.1515/jdis-2017-0006

Chen, C. (2020). A glimpse of the rst eight months of the COVID-19 literature on Microsoft Academic Graph: Themes, citation

contexts, and uncertainties. Frontiers in Research Metrics and Analytics, 5, 607286. https://doi.org/10.3389/

frma.2020.607286

Chen, C., & Song, M. (2019). Visualizing a eld of research: A methodology of systematic scientometric reviews. PLoS ONE,

14(10), e0223994. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0223994

Chen, C., Ibekwe-SanJuan, F., & Hou, J. (2010). The structure and dynamics of cocitation clusters: A multiple฀perspective

cocitation analysis. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 61(7),

1386–1409. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21309

Dounas-Frazer, D. R., Ríos, L., & Lewandowski, H. J. (2019). Preliminary model for student ownership of projects. 2019 Phys-

ics Education Research Conference Proceedings, 6. https://doi.org/10.1119/perc.2019.pr.Dounas-Frazer

Edwards, A., Jones, S. M., Wapstra, E., & Richardson, A. M. M. (2007). Engaging students through authentic research experi-

ences. Teaching Matters, 1, 168–171. https://eprints.utas.edu.au/8581/1/edwards.pdf

Faber, E. S. L., Colthorpe, K., Ainscough, L., & Kibedi, J. (2024). Students’ approaches to developing scientic communication

skills. Advances in Physiology Education. https://doi.org/10.1152/advan.00009.2024

Hajdarpasic, A., Brew, A., & Popenici, S. (2015). The contribution of academics’ engagement in research to undergraduate

education. Studies in Higher Education, 40(4), 644–657. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2013.842215

Harmon, J. E., & Gross, A. G. (n.d.). The craft of scientic communication. University of Chicago Press. https://www.

amazon.com/Scientic-Communication-Chicago-Writing-Publishing-ebook/dp/B00AGCVN08

Ishekenova, B. (2024, April 3). Salaries of foresters are among the lowest in Kazakhstan. LSM.kz. https://lsm.kz/zarplaty-

lesnikov-odni-iz-samyh-nizkih-v-kazahstane?utm_source=chatgpt.com

Jackson, J. (2013). Hands-on or hands-off: Effective elements of elementary social studies hands-on lessons. Spectrum,

2(1), 7. https://digitalcommons.brockport.edu/spectrum/vol2/iss1/7/

Juarez, M. T., & Kenet, C. M. (2018). Translating research as an approach to enhance science engagement. International Jour-

nal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 15(8), 1749. https://doi.org/10.3390/IJERPH15081749

Jude, B. A. (2017). Strategies for developing a science communicator through authentic science writing assignments. Con-

nected Science Learning, 4. https://doi.org/10.24918/CS.2017.5

Kanematsu, H., & Barry, D. M. (2016). STEM and creativity. In STEM and Social Science (pp. 15–23). Springer. https://

doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19234-5_3

Longnecker, N., & Gondwe, M. (2014). Graduate degree programmes in science communication: Educating and training sci-

ence communicators to work with communities. In Science Communication (pp. 141–160). Springer. https://doi.

org/10.1007/978-94-017-9097-0_9

National Chamber of Entrepreneurs of the Republic of Kazakhstan “Atameken”. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://atameken.kz/

Okhotina, A. S., & Belonogova, L. N. (2021). Involvement of pedagogical university students in research activities. Improving

the System of Teacher Training for Professional Activity, (4)38, 59–67. https://doi.org/10.33065/2307-

1052-2021-4-38-59-67

Ovsepyan, A. E. (2019). Scientic research work of students and its role in the professional development of graduates on the example

of a single scientic topic. Modern Problems of Science and Education, (5). https://doi.org/10.17513/spno.29222

Parajuli, R., Chizmar, S., Megalos, M., & Bardon, R. (2020). Educating landowners on forest-based alternative income streams

in North Carolina: Program evaluation and lessons learned. Journal of Forestry, 118(6), 551–554. https://doi.

org/10.1093/jofore/fvaa037

Scherz, Z., Spektor-Levy, O., & Eylon, B.-S. (2005). “Scientic Communication”: An instructional program for high-order learn-

ing skills and its impact on students’ performance. In Science Education (pp. 231–243). Springer. https://doi.

org/10.1007/1-4020-3673-6_19

Septriana, H., Suwandi, S., & Sumarwati. (2025). Project-based learning: Improving scientic writing skills with the integration

of ecological literacy among students. Educational Process: International Journal, 15, e2025123. https://doi.

org/10.22521/edupij.2025.15.123

Silverman, A. K. (2012). Students as researchers: The implementation and evaluation of a whole-school pu-

pil voice project in a primary SEBD school (Doctoral dissertation, Institute of Education, University of London).

https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10020710

Strogetskaya, E. V., & Betiger, I. B. (2024). Student involvement in science in the focus of sociological analysis. Discourse,

10(1), 56–72.

https://doi.org/10.32603/2412-8562-2024-10-1-56-72

Suparman, S. F., & Darmawan, N. H. (2022). Science writing heuristic: To enhance students’ communication and research skill.

www.ijcrsee.com

454

Alipina, K., et al. (2025). Development of Scientific Writing and Communication Skills in the Context of Forestry Research,

International Journal of Cognitive Research in Science, Engineering and Education (IJCRSEE), 13(2), 439-453.

Didaktik: Jurnal Ilmiah PGSD STKIP Subang, 8(2), 1296–1308.

https://doi.org/10.36989/didaktik.v8i2.352

University of British Columbia. (2024). Faculty of Forestry – Undergraduate Programs. https://forestry.ubc.ca/future-

students/undergraduate/

Willems-Jones, A. J., Tan, J.-L., Kountouri, N., & Russell, J. (2019). Harmonising the teaching of scientic communication

skills through the development of an e-learning tool. International Journal of Innovation in Science and

Mathematics Education, 27(1), 136–147. https://openjournals.library.sydney.edu.au/index.php/IISME/article/

download/12853/12130

Zakon.kz. (n.d.). Information portal of Kazakhstan. Retrieved from https://www.zakon.kz/

Zimmerman, D. E., Akerelrea, C., Smith, J. K., & O’Keefe, G. J. (2006). Communicating forest management science and prac-

tices through visualized and animated media approaches to community presentations: An exploration and assessment.

Science Communication, 27(4), 514–539. https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547006288004