www.ijcrsee.com
375
Bin Dawood, A., Dickinson, A., & Jones, M. (2023). Investigation of the relationship between orientation discrimination
thresholds, autistic, and schizotypal personality traits, International Journal of Cognitive Research in Science, Engineering and
Education (IJCRSEE), 11(3), 375-387.
Introduction
The role of Excitation-Inhibition (E-I) balance in sensory processing has been har-nessed through
the use of psychophysical tasks (Edden et al., 2009; Freyberg et al., 2015; Robertson et al., 2013; Snijders
et al., 2013; Trakoshis et al., 2020; Yoon et al., 2010), see (Dickinson, Jones, et al., 2016). An advantage
of psychophysical tasks is that the E-I balance differences inferred from them must be of ‘functional
relevance’. Indeed, one commonly used psycho-physical task for this purpose is the visual-Orientation
Discrimination Task (ODT) (Dickinson, Bruyns-Haylett, et al., 2016; Dickinson et al., 2014; Shaw et al.,
2019), given its well-known association with inhibitory mechanisms (Edden et al., 2009). A vast range of
animal (Katzner et al., 2011; Leventhal et al., 2003; Sillito, 1975; Xia et al., 2013) and human research
(Edden et al., 2009; Kurcyus et al., 2018) supports the vital role of cortical inhibition on orientation
selectivity tuning and perceptual judgment of stimuli’s orientations due to their associations with GABA,
the main inhibitory transmitter. For instance, animal research showed that orientation selectivity tuning
reduced following the application of GABA antagonist (Katzner et al., 2011; Sillito, 1975) but increased
following the application of GABA agonist (Leventhal et al., 2003; Xia et al., 2013). Similarly, enhanced
visual orientation discrimination skills in humans are linked to higher GABA concentration levels in the
visual cortex (Edden et al., 2009; Kurcyus et al., 2018). Together, these ndings suggest that performance
in ODT may provide a useful, al-beit indirect, indicator of cortical E-I balance in the visual cortex.
ODT traditionally uses two different conditions, namely cardinal and oblique conditions. In the
cardinal condition, participants judge orientation deviation from vertical or horizontal reference stimuli
(i.e., 0/90 degrees). In the oblique condition, however, participants judge orientation deviation from
oblique reference stimuli (i.e., 45/135 degrees). It is widely recognised that performance in the cardinal
condition is superior to that in the oblique condition (Dickinson et al., 2015; Dickinson et al., 2014; Edden
Investigation of the Relationship Between Orientation Discrimination
Thresholds, Autistic, and Schizotypal Personality Traits
Abdullah Bin Dawood1* , Abigail Dickinson2 , Myles Jones3
1Department of Psychology, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, e-mail: Aaldawood1@ksu.edu.sa
2Center for Autism Research and Treatment, University of California, Semel Institute for Neuroscience, Los Angeles, United
States of America, e-mail: abbydickinson317@gmail.com
3Department of Psychology, University of Shefeld, Shefeld UK, e-mail: m.jones@shefeld.ac.uk
Abstract: Imbalances in cortical excitation and inhibition (E-I) have been implicated in both autism spectrum conditions
(ASC) and schizophrenia spectrum conditions (SSC). However, most studies investigate these clinical conditions independently,
possibly due to the difculty of obtaining comorbid clinical populations. As such, the current study investigated the relationship
between performance in the orientation discrimination task “ODT” as a potential proxy for E-I balance and the autistic (as
assessed by Autism Spectrum Quotient “AQ”) and schizotypal personality traits (as assessed by Schizotypal Personality
Questionnaire-Brief “SPQ-BR”) in the general population. 87 healthy adult volunteers participated in the study. We found that
high autistic personality traits are associated with enhanced performance in the oblique condition of ODT. In contrast, high
schizotypal personality traits are associated with poor performance in the vertical condition of ODT. Such associations support
the suggested disruption of cortical E-I balance in ASC and SSC.
Keywords: Excitation inhibition balance, Orientation Discrimination Task, Autistic personality traits, Schizotypal personality
traits, Visual Perception.
Original scientic paper
Received: March 29, 2023.
Revised: April 26, 2023.
Accepted: May 11, 2023.
UDC:
616.89-008.48:159.923.3.075(410)
616.895.8:159.923.3.075(410)
10.23947/2334-8496-2023-11-3-375-387
© 2023 by the authors. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the
Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
*Corresponding author: Aaldawood1@ksu.edu.sa
www.ijcrsee.com
376
Bin Dawood, A., Dickinson, A., & Jones, M. (2023). Investigation of the relationship between orientation discrimination
thresholds, autistic, and schizotypal personality traits, International Journal of Cognitive Research in Science, Engineering and
Education (IJCRSEE), 11(3), 375-387.
et al., 2009; Orban et al., 1984; Vogels and Orban, 1985), possibly due to the larger number of cortical
cells tuned to cardinally orientated objects compared to obliquely oriented ones (Hubel and Wiesel, 1968;
Manseld, 1974; Manseld, 1974). This neural orientation selectivity has been proposed to explain the
well-known ‘oblique effect’, which refers to performance deciency in judging obliquely oriented stimuli
compared to cardinally oriented ones (Appelle, 1972).
Several studies have shown ODT performance differences in individuals with autism spectrum
conditions (ASC) and schizophrenia spectrum conditions (SSC) compared to neurotypical (NT)
individuals (Dickinson, Bruyns-Haylett, et al., 2016; Shaw et al., 2019). For instance, compared to NT
individuals, those with ASC have been reported to have enhanced performance in oblique orientation
discrimination (as indicated by lower OD thresholds) (Dickinson, Bruyns-Haylett, et al., 2016). However,
the same enhancement was absent for the vertical condition of ODT, possibly due to the ceiling effect
(Garin, 2014a), as vertical OD thresholds are about one-fth of the oblique OD thresholds (Edden et al.,
2009). Additionally, compared to NT individuals, individuals with SSC have been reported to have poorer
performance in ODT (as indicated by higher OD thresholds) in vertical and oblique ODT conditions (Shaw
et al., 2019). Both enhanced and impaired performance in ODT has been suggested to reect cortical
E-I imbalance (Dickinson, Bruyns-Haylett, et al., 2016; Shaw et al., 2019). However, given the practical
difculty in obtaining both comorbid and non-comorbid samples for the same investigation, most studies
have not investigated E-I balance in ASC and SSC simultaneously (Dickinson, Bruyns-Haylett, et al.,
2016; Shaw et al., 2019). This difculty can initially be overcome by measuring the traits associated with
each condition in the general population (Del Giudice et al., 2010; Del Giudice et al., 2014; Ford et al.,
2018; Hurst et al., 2006).
Indeed, in addition to ODT studies in clinical samples with ASC, studies with subclinical traits of
ASC (as measured by Autism Spectrum Quotient “AQ”) have reported that higher autistic personality traits
in NT individuals are associated with enhanced ODT performance in the oblique condition compared to
those with low autistic personality traits (Dickinson et al., 2015; Dickinson et al., 2014). These ndings have
been suggested to indicate increased cortical inhibition in the visual cortex of individuals with high autistic
personality traits compared to those with low autistic personality traits (Dickinson et al., 2015; Dickinson
et al., 2014). This suggestion has also been supported by neurophysiological measures, as individuals
with higher autistic personality traits have higher peak gamma frequency than individuals with low autistic
personality traits (Dickinson et al., 2015), given that variations in peak gamma frequency have been
associated with levels of GABA concentrations in the visual cortex (Edden et al., 2009). Notwithstanding,
such an association between peak gamma frequency and GABA concentration levels in the visual
cortex was not replicated in a more recent study (Cousijn et al., 2014), possibly as a consequence of
methodological differences related to sample size and the techniques used in measuring GABA (i.e., type
of MRS sequence) (Kujala et al., 2015).
Although previous studies have investigated the relationship between ODT performance and autistic
personality traits (Dickinson et al., 2015; Dickinson et al., 2014), we are unaware of any study that has
assessed ODT performance in relation to schizotypal personality traits. Given the differences between
ASC and SSC clinical groups (i.e., enhanced and impaired, respectively) compared to NT control groups,
we may expect poor ODT performance in individuals with higher schizotypal personality traits. However,
there is a link between autistic and schizotypal personality traits (Dinsdale et al., 2013; Ford et al., 2017;
Ford and Crewther, 2014; Nenadić et al., 2021; Russell-Smith et al., 2011); see (Zhou et al., 2019). Thus,
we may expect a similar enhanced ODT performance of individuals with high autistic personality traits in
those with higher schizotypal personality traits.
The current study aimed to investigate the relationship between performance in ODT and both
autistic and schizotypal personality traits in one sample, helping to disentangle these two possibilities.
Ultimately, investigating the relationship between ODT and both autistic and schizotypal traits may provide
a deeper understanding of the neural mechanisms underlying subclinical autistic and schizotypal traits,
given the suggestion that ASC and SSC are two opposites on the same spectrum (Abu-Akel et al., 2018;
Ford et al., 2017; Nenadić et al., 2021; Russell-Smith et al., 2010).
Materials and Methods
Participants
Eighty seven healthy volunteers from the University of Shefeld with normal or corrected to normal
vision participated in the study. Twenty - eight were rst-year Psychology students and received credits
for participation. The rest (N=59) were recruited from the students and staff-volunteering email list of
www.ijcrsee.com
377
Bin Dawood, A., Dickinson, A., & Jones, M. (2023). Investigation of the relationship between orientation discrimination
thresholds, autistic, and schizotypal personality traits, International Journal of Cognitive Research in Science, Engineering and
Education (IJCRSEE), 11(3), 375-387.
the University of Shefeld and received a £7 Amazon voucher for participation in the study. Participants
provided (written) informed consent before taking part. The study received full ethical approval from the
Department of Psychology University of Shefeld ethics committee.
Orientation Discrimination Task
We used an orientation discrimination task (ODT) initially developed by (Edden et al., 2009) and
had previously been used to measure orientation discrimination in several studies (Bin Dawood et al.,
2020; Dickinson, Bruyns-Haylett, et al., 2016; Dickinson et al., 2015; Dickinson et al., 2014). The ODT
measures orientation discrimination thresholds using a two-alternative forced-choice adaptive staircase
procedure (Leek, 2001; Treutwein, 1995) and was programmed in MATLAB (The MathWorks Inc., Natick,
MA, 2000) with PsychToolbox (Brainard, 1997).
In each trial of ODT, two circular black and white gratings (diameter 4°; spatial frequency three
cycles/degree; contrast 99 %; mean luminance 83 cd/m2) were sequentially presented for 350 ms with
xation of 500 ms between these two gratings, (Figure 1). The rst presented grating is regarded as the
reference grating, whereas the second presented grating is regarded as the target grating. Based on the
orientation of the reference grating, the ODT comprised vertical and oblique conditions. In the vertical
condition, the reference grating was orientated at 0°. In the oblique condition, however, the reference
grating was orientated at 45°. Each condition has two staircases based on the target grating’s rotation
direction (clockwise, anti-clockwise). The staircases implemented one-up three-down procedures,
converging on 79% accuracy (Leek, 2001). For each staircase, the target grating was initially presented 5
degrees away from the reference grating with an initial step size of 1 degree, decreasing 75% after each
reversal.
Figure 1. Schematic diagram of the orientation discrimination task. This gure is reprinted with
permission from (Dickinson et al., 2014).
Participants were asked to sit comfortably on a chair 57 cm away from the monitor in a dimly lit
room. A black circular aperture covered the monitor to eliminate any external orientation cues provided by
the monitor edges. Participants were asked to judge whether the target grating had been tilted clockwise
or anti-clockwise compared to the reference grating using the right and left arrow keys. Participants started
with a practice run of 10 trials for each of the four staircases. Participants then completed the experimental
run consisting of 140 trials for each staircase. The task nished when each staircase had reached eight
reversals and would be terminated if 140 trails were hit for each staircase.
To calculate OD thresholds, we used the nal six reversals from each staircase after discarding the
initial two reversals as practice trials. The thresholds of vertical and oblique conditions were calculated
separately by averaging each condition’s right (clockwise) and left (anti-clockwise) staircases.
Questionnaires
To assess autistic and schizotypal personality traits, we used the Autism Spectrum Quotient (AQ)
(Baron-Cohen et al., 2001) and the Schizotypal Personality Questionnaire-Brief Revised (SPQ-BR)
(Cohen et al., 2010). Both AQ and SPQ-BR scales were administered online using Qualtrics (https://www.
qualtrics.com).
www.ijcrsee.com
378
Bin Dawood, A., Dickinson, A., & Jones, M. (2023). Investigation of the relationship between orientation discrimination
thresholds, autistic, and schizotypal personality traits, International Journal of Cognitive Research in Science, Engineering and
Education (IJCRSEE), 11(3), 375-387.
Autism Spectrum Quotient (AQ)
The Autism Spectrum Quotient (AQ) is a 50-item self-report Quotient for measuring autistic
personality traits in the general population (Baron-Cohen et al., 2001). The items are scored on a 4-point
Likert scale with response options ranging from ‘denitely agree’ to ‘denitely disagree’. The responses are
collapsed into a dichotomous scoring scheme as responses with an endorsement of autistic personality
traits are scored 1 while the opposite responses are scored 0. The ve AQ subscales assess imagination,
attention to detail, communication, attention switching, and social skills subscales. The total score of AQ
ranges from 0-50 for the complete inventory, with a higher score indicative of a higher level of autistic
personality traits.
Schizotypal Personality Questionnaire-Brief Revised
The Schizotypal Personality Questionnaire-Brief Revised (SPQ-BR) is a 32-item self-report
questionnaire for measuring schizotypal personality traits (Cohen et al., 2010). The items are scored on a
5-point Likert scale with response options ranging from ‘strongly disagree’ to ‘strongly agree’. The SPQ-BR
consists of positive (i.e., “Cognitive-Perceptual”), negative (i.e., “Interpersonal”), and disorganised (i.e.,
“Disorganized”) subscales, with a total score ranging from 0 to 128 for the complete inventory whereby a
higher score is indicative of a higher level of schizotypal traits.
Exclusion Criteria
Three exclusion criteria were applied. One criterion was failing to reach six staircase reversals in
any condition of ODT. Another criterion was having OD thresholds with more than two standard deviations
(SD) away from the average (mean). The last criterion was failing to complete the survey. Data from 16
participants were excluded. Two participants failed to reach six staircase reversals in any ODT condition.
Also, the OD thresholds of six participants in any condition of ODT were more than 2 SD away from the
average. Additionally, eight participants did not complete the online survey, Tables 1 and 2.
Table 1. Illustrates the demographic information of 71 participants (46 female, 25 male) whose
data were included in the analyses after applying the exclusion criteria stated earlier.
www.ijcrsee.com
379
Bin Dawood, A., Dickinson, A., & Jones, M. (2023). Investigation of the relationship between orientation discrimination
thresholds, autistic, and schizotypal personality traits, International Journal of Cognitive Research in Science, Engineering and
Education (IJCRSEE), 11(3), 375-387.
Table 2. Illustrates each participant’s demographic information after applying the exclusion criteria
stated earlier
No. Sex Age AQ Score SPQ Score Vertical OD
Thresholds (°) Oblique OD
Thresholds (°)
1 F 26 28 103 0.95 7.01
2 F 36 28 127 3.80 11.63
3 F 24 27 77 0.94 4.45
4 F 18 26 92 0.80 5.66
5 F 20 26 85 2.28 8.69
6 F 24 26 98 1.81 3.89
7 F 28 26 72 0.64 6.97
8 F 21 26 106 1.80 6.89
9 F 26 25 97 2.29 6.71
10 F 18 24 112 2.82 8.61
11 F 22 24 93 1.95 7.77
12 F 29 24 93 2.62 9.63
13 F 25 23 112 3.95 7.37
14 F 22 22 66 4.03 13.26
15 F 19 21 105 2.29 7.75
16 F 19 21 80 2.34 9.71
17 F 34 21 76 3.00 7.05
18 F 25 21 81 2.40 6.05
19 F 23 20 87 3.14 10.7
20 F 20 19 92 1.48 5.96
21 F 21 18 96 4.36 8.65
22 F 20 17 106 4.46 9.61
23 F 20 16 86 1.90 10.31
24 F 18 16 103 1.82 8.15
25 F 18 16 74 1.27 10.93
26 F 28 16 56 1.37 11.71
27 F 19 16 63 2.04 8.28
28 F 37 16 84 0.53 4.69
29 F 19 16 65 0.89 6.09
30 F 18 15 90 1.35 13.52
31 F 27 15 77 1.12 5.33
32 F 27 15 75 0.93 7.29
33 F 18 14 73 0.91 9.00
34 F 18 13 100 1.13 9.48
35 F 19 13 79 1.02 5.27
36 F 21 13 88 1.61 8.81
37 F 23 13 86 0.50 6.84
38 F 18 12 92 3.93 7.32
39 F 18 12 65 1.78 8.97
40 F 18 10 88 2.48 7.14
41 F 23 10 69 2.03 8.48
42 F 26 10 65 0.58 4.55
www.ijcrsee.com
380
Bin Dawood, A., Dickinson, A., & Jones, M. (2023). Investigation of the relationship between orientation discrimination
thresholds, autistic, and schizotypal personality traits, International Journal of Cognitive Research in Science, Engineering and
Education (IJCRSEE), 11(3), 375-387.
43 F 18 8 73 2.43 13.00
44 F 33 8 104 2.53 9.88
45 F 19 7 56 1.72 10.21
46 F 18 7 77 2.04 10.50
47 M 18 37 106 1.77 6.13
48 M 19 36 115 2.93 10.25
49 M 27 32 66 0.90 4.97
50 M 19 29 96 0.55 4.40
51 M 20 29 95 0.60 4.20
52 M 31 26 101 0.90 3.25
53 M 20 24 58 1.41 7.21
54 M 19 24 103 1.02 6.47
55 M 19 22 94 0.82 8.48
56 M 32 21 57 1.57 9.07
57 M 19 21 86 0.98 3.93
58 M 28 20 101 1.27 6.69
59 M 26 19 94 1.10 8.29
60 M 20 18 91 1.33 7.84
61 M 20 18 95 0.96 6.69
62 M 20 18 71 1.29 5.20
63 M 19 17 81 1.92 9.39
64 M 22 17 79 4.91 11.3
65 M 22 15 80 0.65 4.46
66 M 18 14 99 1.50 8.28
67 M 21 14 71 0.86 7.75
68 M 22 14 71 1.33 8.77
69 M 30 14 61 0.67 6.93
70 M 21 12 64 0.98 9.14
71 M 19 6 64 0.78 4.01
www.ijcrsee.com
381
Bin Dawood, A., Dickinson, A., & Jones, M. (2023). Investigation of the relationship between orientation discrimination
thresholds, autistic, and schizotypal personality traits, International Journal of Cognitive Research in Science, Engineering and
Education (IJCRSEE), 11(3), 375-387.
Results
Data from 71 participants (46 female, 25 male; mean age 22.42; SD= 4.82; age range = 18–37) were
used to examine the relationship between ODT performance, autistic personality traits, and schizotypal
personality traits. The mean threshold of the vertical condition of ODT was 1.76° with a standard deviation
of 1.06°, while the mean threshold of the oblique condition of ODT was 7.80° with a standard deviation
of 2.38°. Paired sample t-test analysis showed a statistically signicant difference between vertical and
oblique ODT performance (t (70) =-24.88, p<.0001), Figure 2.
Figure 2. Mean orientation discrimination thresholds for the vertical and oblique conditions of the
orientation discrimination task. Error bars represent standard deviation. ***p < 0.0001.
AQ scores ranged from 6 to 37 (mean=18.83, SD=6.78), and SBQ-BR scores ranged from 56 to
127 (Mean=85.11, SD=16.21). The internal consistency analysis of both AQ and SPQ-BR scales revealed
high reliability, with Cronbach’s alpha of .80 for AQ and .85 for SPQ-BR.
To examine the relationship between performance in ODT, autistic personality traits, and schizotypal
personality traits, a Pearson correlation analysis was performed using the following variables: vertical OD
thresholds, oblique OD thresholds, AQ scores, and SPQ-BR scores.
We found a statistically signicant positive correlation between vertical OD thresholds and SPQ-
BR scores, (r= .304, n=71, p=.010). Higher vertical OD thresholds (worse task performance) correlated
with higher SPQ-BR scores, (Figure 3(a)). Also, we found a statistically signicant negative correlation
between oblique OD thresholds and AQ scores, (r= -.241, n=71, p=.043). Lower oblique OD thresholds
(better task performance) correlated with higher AQ scores, (Figure 3(b)). However, we found no signicant
correlation between vertical OD thresholds and AQ scores (r=.052, n=71, p=.33), nor was it between
oblique OD thresholds and SPQ-BR scores (r=-.036, n=71, p=.77).
www.ijcrsee.com
382
Bin Dawood, A., Dickinson, A., & Jones, M. (2023). Investigation of the relationship between orientation discrimination
thresholds, autistic, and schizotypal personality traits, International Journal of Cognitive Research in Science, Engineering and
Education (IJCRSEE), 11(3), 375-387.
Figure 3. (a) A correlation between vertical orientation discrimination thresholds and SPQ-BR
scores (r= .304, n=71 p=.010), and (b) A correlation between oblique orientation discrimination thresholds
and AQ scores (r= -.241, n=71 p=.043).
Additionally, the result showed that AQ scores positively correlated with SPQ-BR scores (r= .455,
n=71, p< .0001), (Figure 4).
Figure 4. A correlation between AQ scores and SPQ-BR scores (r= .455, n=71, p< .0001).
Furthermore, two partial correlation analyses were performed, given the correlational relationship
between AQ and SPQ-BR.
The rst partial correlation analysis was to assess the relationship between vertical OD thresholds
and SPQ-BR scores while controlling for AQ scores. The result revealed a statistically signicant positive
correlation between vertical OD thresholds and SPQ-BR scores when the AQ scores were controlled for
(r=.316 n=71, p=.008).
The second partial correlation analysis assessed the relationship between oblique OD thresholds
and AQ scores while controlling for the SPQ-BR scores. The result revealed a statistically negative
correlation between oblique OD thresholds and AQ scores when the SPQ-BR scores were controlled for
(r=-.253, n=71, p=.035).
In addition, to conrm that the associations between OD thresholds and scores in personality traits
were not driven by other possible factors such as age, which has been linked to cortical E-I balance in
previous studies (Abuleil, McCulloch and Thompson, 2019; King et al., 2020; Petitet et al., 2021; Pitchaiuthu
www.ijcrsee.com
383
Bin Dawood, A., Dickinson, A., & Jones, M. (2023). Investigation of the relationship between orientation discrimination
thresholds, autistic, and schizotypal personality traits, International Journal of Cognitive Research in Science, Engineering and
Education (IJCRSEE), 11(3), 375-387.
et al., 2017), further correlation analyses were performed. The results indicated no statistically signicant
correlation between age and both OD thresholds and personality traits, with p-values greater than .05,
Table 3. A possible explanation for the insignicant associations between age and other variables may be
due to the narrow range of age (18- 37 years).
Table 3. illustrates the correlations between age and both OD thresholds and scores
in personality traits.
Discussion
The current study aimed to replicate previous studies examining the relationship between
performance in ODT and autistic personality traits (Dickinson et al., 2015; Dickinson et al., 2014) nding
that higher levels of autistic personality traits were associated with lower thresholds in the oblique, but not
vertical, condition of ODT. In the same group of participants, we found that schizotypal personality traits
were linked to ODT performance in the vertical but not in the oblique condition, partially consistent with
the increased OD thresholds that have been found in a clinical sample of participants with SSC (Dickinson
et al., 2015; Dickinson et al., 2014), nding that higher levels of autistic traits were associated with lower
thresholds in the oblique, but not vertical, condition of ODT. In the same group of participants, we found
that schizotypal personality traits were linked to ODT performance in the vertical but not in the oblique
condition, partially consistent with the increased thresholds that have been found in a clinical sample of
participants with SSC (Shaw et al., 2019). Specically, individuals with higher schizotypal personality traits
showed increased OD thresholds (i.e., worse performance) in the vertical condition. Finally, we found that
higher autistic personality traits are associated with higher schizotypal personality traits, consistent with
previous ndings (Dinsdale et al., 2013; Ford et al., 2017; Ford and Crewther, 2014; Russell-Smith et al.,
2011).
As expected based on the hypothesis of increased inhibition in the ASC (Bonnel et al., 2010;
Bonnel et al., 2003; Dickinson, Bruyns-Haylett, et al., 2016; Dickinson et al., 2014), we found that high
autistic personality traits (indexed by high AQ scores) are associated with enhanced performance in
ODT (indexed by low OD thresholds). In line with previous results (Dickinson et al., 2015; Dickinson et
al., 2014), this association was condition-specic as it was only observed in the oblique ODT condition.
A possible explanation for the lack of a signicant relationship between autistic personality traits and
OD thresholds in the vertical condition has been attributed to the ceiling effect (Dickinson et al., 2014).
Compared to OD thresholds in the oblique condition (M=7.81°, SD=2.42°), OD thresholds in the vertical
condition were very low (M=1.78°, SD=1.05°), possibly preventing any potential performance differences
from being detectable (Garin, 2014a). Similar to this orientation-specic association between performance
in ODT and autistic personality traits, Edden et al. (2009) found that GABA concentration level in the visual
cortex was only signicantly associated with performance in the oblique condition of ODT but not with
that of vertical condition, possibly due to ceiling effect. Our nding of an association between high autistic
personality traits and enhanced performance in the oblique condition of ODT supports the suggestion of
increased cortical inhibition in the visual cortex of individuals with high autistic personality traits (Dickinson
et al., 2015; Dickinson et al., 2014).
Consistent with the hypothesis of disrupted E-I balance in the SSC (Abbasi et al., 2023; Anticevic
and Lisman, 2017; Lisman, 2012), the current study found an association between high schizotypal
personality traits (indexed by higher SPQ-BR score) and poor performance in ODT (indexed by high OD
thresholds). However, this association was only statistically signicant for the vertical condition of ODT
but not for the oblique condition. Such poor performance in the vertical condition of ODT may reect
decreased inhibition in the visual cortex, which has been suggested to be associated with SSC (Goto et
al., 2009; Rokem et al., 2011; Yoon et al., 2010; Yoon et al., 2009). For instance, reduced cortical inhibition
www.ijcrsee.com
384
Bin Dawood, A., Dickinson, A., & Jones, M. (2023). Investigation of the relationship between orientation discrimination
thresholds, autistic, and schizotypal personality traits, International Journal of Cognitive Research in Science, Engineering and
Education (IJCRSEE), 11(3), 375-387.
is associated with a broader orientation tuning curve of visual cortical neurons of individuals with SSC
(Rokem et al., 2011). As such, the lack of observing any signicant relationship between high schizotypal
personality traits and performance in the oblique condition of ODT might be due to the so-called ‘oor
effect’ (Garin, 2014b). This is because the visual orientation-tuning curve is initially broader for oblique
orientations than the vertical ones (Ringach, 1998), possibly limiting any further performance reduction
from being detectable.
Additionally, our nding of an association between high schizotypal personality traits and poorer
ODT performance is consistent with that of (Shaw et al., 2019) nding that individuals with SSC had
poorer ODT performance than NT individuals. However, it should be noted that (Shaw et al., 2019) found
that individuals with SSC had higher OD thresholds in both vertical and oblique conditions. Such partial
inconsistency could be related to the type of population. For example, while the study of (Shaw et al.,
2019) included a sample of clinically diagnosed individuals with SSC, our current study included a sample
of NT individuals with subclinical traits.
In line with previous studies (Dinsdale et al., 2013; Ford et al., 2017; Ford and Crewther, 2014;
Russell-Smith et al., 2011), we also found a signicant association between autistic and schizotypal
personality traits as high AQ scores are associated with high SPQ-BR scores. This is expected based
on previous studies showing an association between ASC and SSC (Burbach and van der Zwaag, 2009;
Chisholm et al., 2015; King and Lord, 2011; Pilowsky et al., 2000; Volkmar and Cohen, 1991; Wood,
2017). For instance, a systematic review and meta-analysis study examining the association between
ASC and SSC reported a 3.4% to 52% prevalence rate of ASC in individuals with SSC (Chisholm et
al., 2015). ASC and SSC have been characterised by defects in social, cognitive, and communication
functions (Pilowsky et al., 2000). Also, ASC and SSC have been suggested to share the same pathogenic
mechanism (Burbach and van der Zwaag, 2009). Additionally, our nding is consistent with previous
studies investigating the relationship between autistic personality traits and schizotypal personality
traits (Dinsdale et al., 2013; Ford et al., 2017; Ford and Crewther, 2014; Russell-Smith et al., 2011). For
instance, autistic personality traits and schizotypal personality traits of non-clinical participants were found
to be positively associated with each other (Dinsdale et al., 2013).
As previously reported (Dinsdale et al., 2013; Ford et al., 2017; Ford and Crewther, 2014; Nenadić
et al., 2021; Russell-Smith et al., 2011), AQ scores and SPQ-BR scores were correlated in the current
study. Given their association, the question arose as to how AQ scores and SPQ-BR scores could correlate
differentially with ODT performance. As is typical, the correlation between AQ scores and SPQ-BR scores
is below 1 in the current study (r=0.455), allowing the possibility for the scores of these two inventories
to independently and differentially correlate with ODT performance. To further investigate this possibility,
partial correlations were used to demonstrate that after controlling for AQ scores, the correlation between
SPQ-BR scores and vertical OD thresholds (r=.316) was similar to the zero-order correlation (r=.304).
Likewise, after controlling for SPQ-BR , the correlation between AQ scores and oblique OD thresholds
(r=-.253) was similar to zero-order correlation (r=-.241). This suggests that despite their association, AQ
scores and SPQ-BR correlate independently and differentially with ODT performance. Indeed, similar
ndings have been found for global versus local processing (Russell-Smith et al., 2010). Despite the
correlation between autistic and schizotypal traits, individuals with high autistic personality traits had an
advantage or preference for local versus global processing than those with low autistic personality traits
(Russell-Smith et al., 2010). However, individuals with high schizotypal personality traits were found to
have an advantage or preference for global versus local processing than those with low schizotypal
personality traits (Russell-Smith et al., 2010). Our divergent pattern of ndings regarding ODT performance
within the same sample is interesting. For instance, while ASC and SSC have been linked to enhanced
and impaired ODT performance, respectively (Dickinson, Bruyns-Haylett, et al., 2016; Shaw et al., 2019),
we show that these relationships remain present when studying these two types of traits within the same
sample. Our ndings may contribute unique mechanistic insight regarding E-I disruptions that cannot be
inferred when studying autistic and schizotypal samples independently.
Conclusion
The current study extended previous studies examining the relationship between performance in
ODT and autistic personality traits by examining schizotypal personality traits in the same sample. Similar
to previous studies (Dickinson et al., 2015; Dickinson et al., 2014), we found that higher levels of autistic
personality traits are associated with enhanced performance in the oblique condition of ODT. Additionally,
we found that high schizotypal personality traits are associated with poorer performance in the vertical
www.ijcrsee.com
385
Bin Dawood, A., Dickinson, A., & Jones, M. (2023). Investigation of the relationship between orientation discrimination
thresholds, autistic, and schizotypal personality traits, International Journal of Cognitive Research in Science, Engineering and
Education (IJCRSEE), 11(3), 375-387.
condition of ODT, as expected based on the ndings of (Shaw et al., 2019). Finally, we replicated the
previously demonstrated relationship between autistic and schizotypal personality traits (Dinsdale et al.,
2013; Ford et al., 2017). Future studies should examine such associations in different cultural contexts,
given the critical role of culture on cognition and mental health diagnoses (Banerjee, 2012; Kim, 2012;
Phillips, 2019).
Acknowledgements
This is a research project that was supported by a grant from the research centre for the College of
Education, Deanship of Scientic Research at King Saud University.
Conict of interests
The authors declare no conict of interest.
Author Contributions
ABD and MJ planned the experiment. AD developed and provided the software for the ODT. ABD
collected and analysed the data. MJ supervised the project. ABD wrote the manuscript, and MJ and AD
edited it. All authors reviewed the manuscript and agreed with the content.
References
Abbasi, S., Wolff, A., Çatal, Y., & Northoff, G. (2023). Increased noise relates to abnormal excitation-inhibition balance in
schizophrenia: a combined empirical and computational study. Cerebral Cortex, 33(20), 10477-10491. https://doi.
org/10.1093/cercor/bhad297
Abu-Akel, A., Apperly, I., Spaniol, M. M., Geng, J. J., & Mevorach, C. (2018). Diametric effects of autism tendencies and
psychosis proneness on attention control irrespective of task demands. Scientic Reports, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/
s41598-018-26821-7
Abuleil, D., McCulloch, D. L., & Thompson, B. (2019). Older adults exhibit greater visual cortex inhibition and reduced
visual cortex plasticity compared to younger adults. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 13, 607. https://doi.org/10.3389/
fnins.2019.00607
Anticevic, A., & Lisman, J. (2017). How Can Global Alteration of Excitation/Inhibition Balance Lead to the Local Dysfunctions
That Underlie Schizophrenia? Biological Psychiatry, 81(10), 818–820. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsych.2016.12.006
Appelle, S. (1972). Perception and discrimination as a function of stimulus orientation: The “oblique effect” in man and animals.
Psychological Bulletin, 78(4), 266–278. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0033117
Austin, E. J. (2005). Personality correlates of the broader autism phenotype as assessed by the Autism Spectrum Quotient
(AQ). Personality and individual differences, 38(2), 451-460. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2004.04.022
Banerjee, A. (2012). Cross-cultural variance of schizophrenia in symptoms, diagnosis and treatment. Georgetown University
journal of health sciences, 6(2), 18-24.
Baron-Cohen, S., Wheelwright, S., Skinner, R., Martin, J., & Clubley, E. (2001). The autism-spectrum quotient (AQ): Evidence
from asperger syndrome/high-functioning autism, malesand females, scientists and mathematicians. Journal of autism
and developmental disorders, 31(1), 5-17. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005653411471
Bin Dawood, A., Dickinson, A., Aytemur, A., Howarth, C., Milne, E., & Jones, M. (2020). Investigating the Effects of tDCS
on Visual Orientation Discrimination Task Performance: “the Possible Inuence of Placebo”. Journal of Cognitive
Enhancement, 4(3), 235-249. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41465-019-00154-3
Bonnel, A., McAdams, S., Smith, B., Berthiaume, C., Bertone, A., Ciocca, V., Burack, J. A., & Mottron, L. (2010). Enhanced
pure-tone pitch discrimination among persons with autism but not Asperger syndrome. Neuropsychologia, 48(9),
2465–2475. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2010.04.020
Bonnel, A., Mottron, L., Peretz, I., Trudel, M., Gallun, E., & Bonnel, A.M. (2003). Enhanced Pitch Sensitivity in Individuals
with Autism: A Signal Detection Analysis. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 15(2), 226–235. https://doi.
org/10.1162/089892903321208169
Brainard, D. H. (1997). The Psychophysics Toolbox. Spatial Vision, 10(4), 433–436. https://doi.org/10.1163/156856897x00357
Burbach, J. P. H., & van der Zwaag, B. (2009). Contact in the genetics of autism and schizophrenia. Trends in Neurosciences,
32(2), 69–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tins.2008.11.002
Chisholm, K., Lin, A., Abu-Akel, A., & Wood, S. J. (2015). The association between autism and schizophrenia spectrum
disorders: A review of eight alternate models of co-occurrence. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 55, 173-183.,
173–183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2015.04.012
Cohen, A. S., Matthews, R. A., Najolia, G. M., & Brown, L. A. (2010). Toward a More Psychometrically Sound Brief Measure
of Schizotypal Traits: Introducing the SPQ-Brief Revised. Journal of Personality Disorders, 24(4), 516–537. https://doi.
org/10.1521/pedi.2010.24.4.516
Cousijn, H., Haegens, S., Wallis, G., Near, J., Stokes, M. G., Harrison, P. J., & Nobre, A. C. (2014). Resting GABA and
glutamate concentrations do not predict visual gamma frequency or amplitude. Proceedings of the National Academy
of Sciences, 111(25), 9301–9306. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1321072111
Del Giudice, M., Angeleri, R., Brizio, A., & Elena, M. R. (2010). The evolution of autistic-like and schizotypal traits: A sexual
selection hypothesis. Frontiers in Psychology, 1, 41. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2010.00041
www.ijcrsee.com
386
Bin Dawood, A., Dickinson, A., & Jones, M. (2023). Investigation of the relationship between orientation discrimination
thresholds, autistic, and schizotypal personality traits, International Journal of Cognitive Research in Science, Engineering and
Education (IJCRSEE), 11(3), 375-387.
Del Giudice, M., Klimczuk, A. C. E., Traconte, D. M., & Maestripieri, D. (2014). Autistic-like and schizotypal traits in a life
history perspective: diametrical associations with impulsivity, sensation seeking, and sociosexual behavior. Evolution
and Human Behavior, 35(5), 415–424. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2014.05.007
Dhand, N., & Khatkar, M. (2014). Statulator: An online statistical calculator. Sample Size Calculator for Estimating a Single
Proportion.
Dickinson, A., Bruyns-Haylett, M., Jones, M., & Milne, E. (2015). Increased peak gamma frequency in individuals with higher
levels of autistic traits. European Journal of Neuroscience, 41(8), 1095–1101. Portico. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejn.12881
Dickinson, A., Bruyns-Haylett, M., Smith, R., Jones, M., & Milne, E. (2016). Superior orientation discrimination and increased
peak gamma frequency in autism spectrum conditions. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 125(3), 412–422. https://doi.
org/10.1037/abn0000148
Dickinson, A., Jones, M., & Milne, E. (2014). Oblique Orientation Discrimination Thresholds Are Superior in Those with a High
Level of Autistic Traits. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 44(11), 2844–2850. https://doi.org/10.1007/
s10803-014-2147-1
Dickinson, A., Jones, M., & Milne, E. (2016). Measuring neural excitation and inhibition in autism: Different approaches, different
ndings and different interpretations. Brain Research, 1648, 277–289. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2016.07.011
Dinsdale, N. L., Hurd, P. L., Wakabayashi, A., Elliot, M., & Crespi, B. J. (2013). How Are Autism and Schizotypy Related?
Evidence from a Non-Clinical Population. PLoS ONE, 8(5), e63316. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0063316
Edden, R. A. E., Muthukumaraswamy, S. D., Freeman, T. C. A., & Singh, K. D. (2009). Orientation Discrimination Performance
Is Predicted by GABA Concentration and Gamma Oscillation Frequency in Human Primary Visual Cortex. The Journal
of Neuroscience, 29(50), 15721–15726. https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.4426-09.2009
Ford, T. C., & Crewther, D. P. (2014). Factor Analysis Demonstrates a Common Schizoidal Phenotype within Autistic and
Schizotypal Tendency: Implications for Neuroscientic Studies. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 5, 117. https://doi.org/10.3389/
fpsyt.2014.00117
Ford, T. C., Apputhurai, P., Meyer, D., & Crewther, D. P. (2017). Conrmatory factor analysis of autism and schizophrenia
spectrum traits. Personality and Individual Differences, 110, 80–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2017.01.033
Ford, T. C., Apputhurai, P., Meyer, D., & Crewther, D. P. (2018). Cluster analysis reveals subclinical sub-groups with shared
autistic and schizotypal traits. Psychiatry Research, 265, 111–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2018.04.037
Freyberg, J., Robertson, C., & Baron-Cohen, S. (2015). Atypical Binocular Rivalry Dynamics of Simple and Complex Stimuli in
Autism. Journal of Vision, 15(12), 643-643. https://doi.org/10.1167/15.12.643
Garin, O. (2014a). Ceiling Effect. In A. C. Michalos (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Quality of Life and Well-Being Research (pp. 631-
633). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0753-5_296
Garin, O. (2014b). Floor Effect. In A. C. Michalos (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Quality of Life and Well-Being Research (pp. 2300-
2300). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0753-5_1059
Goto, N., Yoshimura, R., Moriya, J., Kakeda, S., Ueda, N., Ikenouchi-Sugita, A., Umene-Nakano, W., Hayashi, K., Oonari,
N., Korogi, Y., & Nakamura, J. (2009). Reduction of brain γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) concentrations in early-stage
schizophrenia patients: 3T Proton MRS study. Schizophrenia Research, 112(1–3), 192–193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
schres.2009.04.026
Hubel, D. H., & Wiesel, T. N. (1968). Receptive elds and functional architecture of monkey striate cortex. The Journal of
Physiology, 195(1), 215–243. https://doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.1968.sp008455
Hurst, R. M., Nelson-Gray, R. O., Mitchell, J. T., & Kwapil, T. R. (2006). The Relationship of Asperger’s Characteristics and
Schizotypal Personality Traits in a Non-clinical Adult Sample. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 37(9),
1711–1720. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-006-0302-z
Katzner, S., Busse, L., & Carandini, M. (2011). GABAAInhibition Controls Response Gain in Visual Cortex. The Journal of
Neuroscience, 31(16), 5931–5941. https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.5753-10.2011
Kim, H. U. (2012). Autism across cultures: rethinking autism. Disability & Society, 27(4), 535–545. https://doi.org/10.1080/096
87599.2012.659463
King, B. H., & Lord, C. (2011). Is schizophrenia on the autism spectrum? Brain Research, 1380, 34–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
brainres.2010.11.031
King, B. R., Rumpf, J. J., Verbaanderd, E., Heise, K. F., Dolfen, N., Sunaert, S., . . . Puts, N. A. (2020). Baseline sensorimotor
GABA levels shape neuroplastic processes induced by motor learning in older adults. Human brain mapping, 41(13),
3680-3695. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.25041
Kujala, J., Jung, J., Bouvard, S., Lecaignard, F., Lothe, A., Bouet, R., Ciumas, C., Ryvlin, P., & Jerbi, K. (2015). Gamma
oscillations in V1 are correlated with GABAA receptor density: A multi-modal MEG and Flumazenil-PET study. Scientic
Reports, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/srep16347
Kurcyus, K., Annac, E., Hanning, N. M., Harris, A. D., Oeltzschner, G., Edden, R., & Riedl, V. (2018). Opposite Dynamics of
GABA and Glutamate Levels in the Occipital Cortex during Visual Processing. The Journal of Neuroscience, 38(46),
9967–9976. https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.1214-18.2018
Lam, N. H., Borduqui, T., Hallak, J., Roque, A., Anticevic, A., Krystal, J. H., ... & Murray, J. D. (2022). Effects of altered
excitation-inhibition balance on decision making in a cortical circuit model. Journal of Neuroscience, 42(6), 1035-1053.
https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1371-20.2021
Leek, M. R. (2001). Adaptive procedures in psychophysical research. Perception & Psychophysics, 63(8), 1279–1292. https://
doi.org/10.3758/bf03194543
Leventhal, A. G., Wang, Y., Pu, M., Zhou, Y., & Ma, Y. (2003). GABA and Its Agonists Improved Visual Cortical Function in
Senescent Monkeys. Science, 300(5620), 812–815. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1082874
Li, B., Peterson, M. R., & Freeman, R. D. (2003). Oblique Effect: A Neural Basis in the Visual Cortex. Journal of Neurophysiology,
90(1), 204–217. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00954.2002
Lisman, J. (2012). Excitation, inhibition, local oscillations, or large-scale loops: what causes the symptoms of schizophrenia?
Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 22(3), 537–544. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conb.2011.10.018
Manseld, R. J. W. (1974). Neural Basis of Orientation Perception in Primate Vision. Science, 186(4169), 1133–1135. https://
doi.org/10.1126/science.186.4169.1133
www.ijcrsee.com
387
Bin Dawood, A., Dickinson, A., & Jones, M. (2023). Investigation of the relationship between orientation discrimination
thresholds, autistic, and schizotypal personality traits, International Journal of Cognitive Research in Science, Engineering and
Education (IJCRSEE), 11(3), 375-387.
Mohan, Y. S., Viswanathan, S., Jayakumar, J., Lloyd, E. K., & Vidyasagar, T. R. (2022). Mechanism underpinning the
sharpening of orientation and spatial frequency selectivities in the tree shrew (Tupaia belangeri) primary visual cortex.
Brain Structure and Function, 227(4), 1265-1278. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00429-021-02445-y
Mukerji, A., Byrne, K. N., Yang, E., Levi, D. M., & Silver, M. A. (2022). Visual cortical γ− aminobutyric acid and perceptual
suppression in amblyopia. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 16, 949395. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2022.949395
Nenadić, I., Meller, T., Evermann, U., Schmitt, S., Pfarr, J.K., Abu-Akel, A., & Grezellschak, S. (2021). Subclinical schizotypal vs.
autistic traits show overlapping and diametrically opposed facets in a non-clinical population. Schizophrenia Research,
231, 32–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.schres.2021.02.018
Orban, G. A., Vandenbussche, E., & Vogels, R. (1984). Human orientation discrimination tested with long stimuli. Vision
Research, 24(2), 121–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/0042-6989(84)90097-x
Petitet, P., Spitz, G., Emir, U. E., Johansen-Berg, H., & O’Shea, J. (2021). Age-related decline in cortical inhibitory tone
strengthens motor memory. NeuroImage, 245, 118681. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2021.118681
Phillips, W. L. (2019). Cross-Cultural Differences in Visual Perception of Color, Illusions, Depth, and Pictures. Cross-Cultural
Psychology, 287–308. Portico. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119519348.ch13
Pilowsky, T., Yirmiya, N., Arbelle, S., & Mozes, T. (2000). Theory of mind abilities of children with schizophrenia, children with
autism, and normally developing children. Schizophrenia Research, 42(2), 145–155. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0920-
9964(99)00101-2
Pitchaimuthu, K., Wu, Q. Z., Carter, O., Nguyen, B. N., Ahn, S., Egan, G. F., & McKendrick, A. M. (2017). Occipital GABA
levels in older adults and their relationship to visual perceptual suppression. Scientic Reports, 7(1), 14231. https://doi.
org/10.1038/s41598-017-14577-5
Ringach, D. L. (1998). Tuning of orientation detectors in human vision. Vision Research, 38(7), 963–972. https://doi.org/10.1016/
s0042-6989(97)00322-2
Robertson, C. E., Kravitz, D. J., Freyberg, J., Baron-Cohen, S., & Baker, C. I. (2013). Slower Rate of Binocular Rivalry in
Autism. The Journal of Neuroscience, 33(43), 16983–16991. https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.0448-13.2013
Rokem, A., Yoon, J. H., Ooms, R. E., Maddock, R. J., Minzenberg, M. J., & Silver, M. A. (2011). Broader Visual Orientation Tuning
in Patients with Schizophrenia. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 5, 127. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2011.00127
Russell-Smith, S. N., Maybery, M. T., & Bayliss, D. M. (2010). Are the Autism and Positive Schizotypy Spectra Diametrically
Opposed in Local Versus Global Processing? Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 40(8), 968–977. https://
doi.org/10.1007/s10803-010-0945-7
Russell-Smith, S. N., Maybery, M. T., & Bayliss, D. M. (2011). Relationships between autistic-like and schizotypy traits: An
analysis using the Autism Spectrum Quotient and Oxford-Liverpool Inventory of Feelings and Experiences. Personality
and Individual Differences, 51(2), 128–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2011.03.027
Shaw, A. D., Knight, L., Freeman, T. C. A., Williams, G. M., Moran, R. J., Friston, K. J., Walters, J. T. R., & Singh, K. D.
(2019). Oscillatory, Computational, and Behavioral Evidence for Impaired GABAergic Inhibition in Schizophrenia.
Schizophrenia Bulletin. https://doi.org/10.1093/schbul/sbz066
Sillito, A. M. (1975). The contribution of inhibitory mechanisms to the receptive eld properties of neurones in the striate cortex
of the cat. The Journal of Physiology, 250(2), 305–329. https://doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.1975.sp011056
Snijders, T. M., Milivojevic, B., & Kemner, C. (2013). Atypical excitation–inhibition balance in autism captured by the gamma
response to contextual modulation. NeuroImage: Clinical, 3, 65–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nicl.2013.06.015
Trakoshis, S., Martínez-Cañada, P., Rocchi, F., Canella, C., You, W., Chakrabarti, B., Ruigrok, A. N. V., Bullmore, E. T.,
Suckling, J., Markicevic, M., Zerbi, V., Baron-Cohen, S., Gozzi, A., Lai, M.C., Panzeri, S., & Lombardo, M. V. (2020).
Intrinsic excitation-inhibition imbalance affects medial prefrontal cortex differently in autistic men versus women. Elife,
9, e55684. https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.01.16.909531
Treutwein, B. (1995). Adaptive psychophysical procedures. Vision Research, 35(17), 2503–2522. https://doi.org/10.1016/0042-
6989(95)00016-x
Vogels, R., & Orban, G. A. (1985). The effect of practice on the oblique effect in line orientation judgments. Vision Research,
25(11), 1679–1687. https://doi.org/10.1016/0042-6989(85)90140-3
Volkmar, F. R., & Cohen, D. J. (1991). Comorbid association of autism and schizophrenia. The American journal of psychiatry,
148(12), 1705-1707. https://doi.org/10.1176/ajp.148.12.1705
Wood, S. J. (2017). Autism and schizophrenia: One, two or many disorders? British Journal of Psychiatry, 210(4), 241–242.
https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.bp.116.193490
Xia, J., Tang, Y., Liang, Z., Yang, Y., Li, G., & Zhou, Y. (2013). GABA increases stimulus selectivity of neurons in primary
visual cortices of cats chronically treated with morphine. Neuroscience, 241, 116–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
neuroscience.2013.03.034
Yoon, J. H., Maddock, R. J., Rokem, A., Silver, M. A., Minzenberg, M. J., Ragland, J. D., & Carter, C. S. (2010). GABA
Concentration Is Reduced in Visual Cortex in Schizophrenia and Correlates with Orientation-Specic Surround
Suppression. The Journal of Neuroscience, 30(10), 3777–3781. https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.6158-09.2010
Yoon, J. H., Rokem, A. S., Silver, M. A., Minzenberg, M. J., Ursu, S., Ragland, J. D., & Carter, C. S. (2009). Diminished
Orientation-Specic Surround Suppression of Visual Processing in Schizophrenia. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 35(6),
1078–1084. https://doi.org/10.1093/schbul/sbp064
Zhou, H., Yang, H., Gong, J., Cheung, E. F. C., Gooding, D. C., Park, S., & Chan, R. C. K. (2019). Revisiting the overlap between
autistic and schizotypal traits in the non-clinical population using meta-analysis and network analysis. Schizophrenia
Research, 212, 6–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.schres.2019.07.050