COGNITIVE THEORIES AND PARADIGMATIC RESEARCH POSTS IN THE FUNCTION OF MULTIMEDIA TEACHING AND LEARNING

Keywords: multimedia teaching, cognitive learning theories, research paradigms, educational process

Abstract

At present it is almost impossible to imagine formal and non-formal education without the use of computers and information and communication technology (ICT), and we can rightly say that modern education is increasingly taking place in a multimedia environment and relying on multimedia teaching and learning. In fact, multimedia with its existence and progress continually poses new challenges to educational technology, but also to the teaching process itself. As a result, classical traditional learning and teaching leaves classrooms, while parallel to that, multimedia becomes an unavoidable segment in the process of acquiring knowledge. The multimedia display provides a better understanding and understanding of teaching content that can be presented in many ways, and which gives a higher educational value. The focus of work is the importance and contribution of the theory of multimedia learning with a focus on activating cognition among students, as well as an analysis of the effectiveness of the use of media in teaching. Also, a special emphasis in the work is focused on the analysis of qualitative and quantitative research methods and techniques for examining the role, significance and efficiency of multimedia teaching and learning in the educational process.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Blagojević, M. (2012). Primena Skinerove teorije programiranja u nastavi gramatike. [Application of Skinner’s theory of programming in grammar teaching]. Tehnika i informatika u obrazovanju, [online] Retrived from: http://www.ftn.kg.ac.rs/konferencije/tio2012/ (Accessed 5.3.2018.)

Bryman, A. (1988). Quantity and quality in social research. London: Routledg. Retrived from: https://epdf.tips/quantity-and-quality-in-social-research-contemporary-social-research.html

Cohen, L., Menion, L. & K. Morrison (2007). Metode istraživanja u obrazovanju. [Methods of research in education]. Jastrebarsko: Naklada Slap.

Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. (4th edition.) Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publication.

Este, D., Sitter, K. & Maclaurin, B. (2009). Using mix methods to understand youth resilience. In: Liebenberg, L. & Ungar, M. (eds.), Researching resilience. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 201-224.

Fajgelj, S. (2010). Metode istraživanja ponašanja. [Methods of behavior research]. Beograd: CPP.

Freshwater, D. & Cahill, J. (2013). Paradigms lost and paradigms regained. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 7(3), 3-5. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689812471276

Guba, E. G. & Lincoln, Y. S. (2005). Paradigmatic controversies, contradictions, and emerging confluences. In: Denzin, N. K. & Lincoln, Y. S. (eds.), The sage handbook of qualitative research (3rd edition). Thousand Oaks: Sage, 191-215 Retrived from: https://sabinemendesmoura.files.wordpress.com/2014/11/gubaelincoln_novo.pdf

Hilčenko, S. (2012). Matematika+ multimedija= “Bajpas”. Od manipuulacije do apstrakcije. [Maths + multimedia = „Bypass“]. From manipulation to abstraction]. Teme, 36(1), 305-317.

Howe, K. R. (1988). Against the quantitative-qualitative incompatibility thesis or dogmas die hard. Educational researcher, 17(8), 10-16. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X017008010

Kožuh, B. & J. Maksimović (2011). Deskriptivna statistika u pedagoškim istraživanjima. [Descriptive statistics in pedagogical research]. Niš: Filozofski fakultet.

Matasić, I. & Dumić, S. (2012). Multimedijske tehnologije u obrazovanju. [Multimedial technology in education]. Medijska istraživanja, 18(1), 143-151 Retrived from: https://hrcak.srce.hr/index.php?show=clanak&id_clanak_jezik=127126

Mateljan, V., Širanović, Ž., & Širanović, Ž. (2007). Načela oblikovanja edukativnog multimedijskog sadržaja u online sinkronom Web okruženju. [Principles od designing educational multimedia content in online synchronous Web environment]. Digital Information Heritage, 483- 492. Retrived from: http://darhiv.ffzg.unizg.hr/id/eprint/7977/

Mayer, R. E. (2009). Multimedia learning (2nd ed). New York: Cambridge University Press

Mayer, R. E. (2011). Applying the science of learning. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson

McGregor, S. L. T. & Murnane, J. A. (2010). Paradigm, methodology and method: Intellectual integrity in consumer scholarship. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 34(4), 419-427. Retrived from: http://www.consultmcgregor.com/documents/research/Methodological-paper-2010-for-web.pdf

Mertens, M. D. (2010). Philosophy in mixed methods teaching: The transformative paradigm as illustration. International Journal of Multiple Research Approaches, 4(1), 9-18. Retrived from: https://doi.org/10.5172/mra.2010.4.1.009

Milas, G. (2005). Istraživačke metode u psihologiji i drugim društvenim znanostima. [Research methods in psychology and other social sciences]. Zagreb: Naklada Slap.

Morgan, D. L. (2007). Paradigms lost and pragmatism regained. Methodological implications of combining qualitative and quantitative methods. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1(1), 48-76. https://doi.org/10.1177/2345678906292462

Nikolova, O. (2002). Effects of students’ participation in authoring of multimedia materials on student acquisition of vocabulary. Language, Learning & Technology, 6(1), 100-122. Retrived from: https://scholarspace.manoa.hawaii.edu/bitstream/10125/25145/1/06_01_nikolova.pdf

Petrović, M. (2016). Uticaj e-modela u 5 koraka na nastavničko modelovanje aktivne nastave uz primenu multimedije. [The effects of the ‘5-step’ e-model on teachers’ modeling of active teaching using multimedia]. Nastava i vaspitanje, 65(3), 647-660 Retrived from: https://scindeks-clanci.ceon.rs/data/pdf/0547-3330/2016/0547-33301603647P.pdf

Piaget, J. (1971). Problèmes de psychologie génétique. Paris, Gonthier.

Plass, J., & Jones, L. (2005). Multimedia learning in second language acquisition. U: The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning, R. Mayer, ur. New York: Cambridge University Press, 467- 488 Retrived from: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511816819.030

Schols, M. (2012). Examining and Understanding Transformative Learning to Foster Technology Professional Development in Higher Education. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 7, 1, 42–49. Retrived from: http://www.uh.cu/static/documents/AL/Examining%20Understanding%20Transformative%20Learning.pdf

Stanković, Z. & Dimić, N. (2016). The Influence of Multimedia on the Creation of Teaching Strategies. TEME - Journal for Social Sciences. 40,(1). 319-333. Retrived from: http://teme2.junis.ni.ac.rs/index.php/TEME/article/viewFile/258/112

Stanković, Z. (2017). Metodički modeli nastave primenom obrazovnog softvera. [Methodical teaching models by using educational software]. Godišnjak pedagoškog fakulteta u Vranju, 7(2), 237-252. Retrived from: https://scindeks-clanci.ceon.rs/data/pdf/2466-3905/2017/2466-39051702237S.pdf

Sweller, J., & Chandler, P. (1991). Evidence for cognitive load theory. Cognition and instruction, 8(4), 351-362. Retrived from: https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532690xci0804_5

Tomić, M., Jukić, R., & Josipović, V. (2016). Multimedijsko učenje i vrednovanje matematičkih panoa na primjeru GeoGebre. [Multimedia learning and evaluating mathematical billboard on the example of Geogebra]. Medijska istraživanja, znanstveno-stručni časopis za novinarstvo i medije, 21(2), 125-155. Retrived from: https://hrcak.srce.hr/152484

Vigotski L.S. (1977). Mišljenje i govor. [Opinion and speech]. Beograd: Nolit.

Published
2018-08-20
How to Cite
Stanković, Z., Maksimović, J., & Osmanović, J. (2018). COGNITIVE THEORIES AND PARADIGMATIC RESEARCH POSTS IN THE FUNCTION OF MULTIMEDIA TEACHING AND LEARNING. International Journal of Cognitive Research in Science, Engineering and Education (IJCRSEE), 6(2), 107-114. https://doi.org/10.5937/ijcrsee1802107S